#### Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Company v. Eno Hinshaw.

Practice — Conflict of Evidence.

Where the record presents only questions of fact arising upon a conflict of evidence, this court will not interfere.

[Opinion filed November 20, 1886.]

Appeal from the County Court of McLean County; the Hon. R. M. Benjamin, Judge, presiding.

Mr. Frank M. Hamilton, for appellant.

Mr. W. B. Carlock, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellee recovered judgment for $10, as damages for the loss of a cow killed on appellant’s road. We find in the record only questions of fact arising upon a conflict of evidence, and therefore can not interfere.

Affirmed.