{
  "id": 5823986,
  "name": "Katherine Connors, Appellee, v. National Council, Knights and Ladies of Security, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Connors v. National Council, Knights & Ladies of Security",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-13",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,351",
  "first_page": "65",
  "last_page": "66",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 Ill. App. 65"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 170,
    "char_count": 2378,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.547,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.198285530154356e-08,
      "percentile": 0.26786098340096276
    },
    "sha256": "74331db84c50b6fd58aeef58c39b0686f2363b5d6b9cc5bd5188f1af75057e29",
    "simhash": "1:0ad54af3540723dc",
    "word_count": 383
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:15:15.348169+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Katherine Connors, Appellee, v. National Council, Knights and Ladies of Security, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice O\u2019Connor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Insurance, \u00a7 752*\u2014what considered in determining fraud in answer in application. As bearing on the question whether an untruthful answ\u00e9r to a question asked of an applicant for benefit insurance in his application was fraudulently made, the question of the materiality of the answer should be considered.\n3. Insurance, \u00a7 897 \u2014when materiality of answers to questions in application question of law. The question of the materiality of answers to questions asked of an insurance applicant in his application is generally one of fact, but may become one of law when all reasonable minds would arrive at the conclusion that the answers were material.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice O\u2019Connor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. W. Foi/eor, for appellant.",
      "Barrhardt & Stafford, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Katherine Connors, Appellee, v. National Council, Knights and Ladies of Security, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,351.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Insurance\u2014when evidence that applicant stated that he had no dead brother is erroneously stricken out. Evidence that in sured stated in his application for insurance that he had no dead brother was material to -the issue and was erroneously stricken out, in an action to recover on the benefit certificate, where the evidence tended to show that he had at the time he applied for the insurance a deceased brother, as, if he fraudulently made false answers to questions in his application that he had no brother dead for the purpose of inducing the defendant to issue to Mm the certificate, there could he no recovery thereon, whether his answer be considered a warranty or a representation.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph B. David, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed March 13, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Katherine Connors, plaintiff, against National Council, Knights and Ladies of Security, a corporation, defendant, to recover on a benefit certificate issued by defendant to plaintiff\u2019s brother, Joseph M. Maher, deceased, for $1,200. From a judgment for plaintiff for $1,200 and interest, defendant appeals.\nA. W. Foi/eor, for appellant.\nBarrhardt & Stafford, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0065-01",
  "first_page_order": 91,
  "last_page_order": 92
}
