#### Roy Woolton, Defendant in Error, v. R. C. Crist, Inc., Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 23,335.

(Not to The reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13 * —when statement of claim sufficient. A statement of claim showing the nature of the demand and giving sufficient information to inform the defendant of the nature of the case is sufficient.

2. Sales, § 282*-—when roritten guaranty does not exclude oral. A written guaranty as to replacing defective parts of a machine does not exclude an oral guaranty by the seller that the machine is in good workable condition.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frank H. Graham, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1917.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 13, 1918.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Boy Woolton, plaintiff, against B. C. Crist, Inc., a corporation, defendant, to recover money paid on the purchase price of motorcycle,' $113.95. From a judgment for plaintiff for $76, on trial before the court without a jury, defendant brings error.

M. E. Gallion, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.