#### William J. Thomas for use of Reid, Murdoch & Company, Appellee, v. Thomas Stenhouse, Appellant.

Gen. No. 23,803.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

Joint adventures, § 8 * —when evidence supports verdict for plaintiff in action to recover share of proceeds of property. In an action by one of two joint owners of property against the other to recover his proportion of the proceeds of the sale of the joint property, evidence held sufficient to support a verdict for plaintiff.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry M. Fisher, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1917.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1918.

Statement of the Case.

Action by William J. Thomas for the use and benefit of Reid, Murdoch & Company, plaintiff, against Thomas Stenhouse, defendant, to recover plaintiff’s share of the proceeds of the sale of joint property. From a judgment for plaintiff for $157.05, defendant appeals.

Norman K. Anderson and Benjamin Clarke, for appellant.-

Worth Allen, for appellee.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Dever

delivered the opinion of the court.

_____________