{
  "id": 5818407,
  "name": "John Looney, Appellee, v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Looney v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1918-04-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 6,520",
  "first_page": "511",
  "last_page": "512",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 Ill. App. 511"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1754,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.582,
    "sha256": "e86502ce51c4d1f9714a4cd3e19ec0494796ff516c8ce2b9c2ca96b03b66a0ed",
    "simhash": "1:463b858402aa341c",
    "word_count": 288
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:15:15.348169+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John Looney, Appellee, v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Niehaus\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Niehaus"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stafford, Schoede & Stafford, for appellant; M. L. Bell and A. B. Enoch, of counsel.",
      "J. T. and S. B. Kenworthy and J. Hays Britton, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John Looney, Appellee, v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 6,520.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Rock Island county; the Hon. Benjamin S. Bell, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 9, 1918.\nRehearing denied May 14, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by John Looney, plaintiff, against Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, defendant, to recover for injury to an interstate shipment of horses. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Carriers, \u00a7 248 \u2014when evidence of price paid for horses is incompetent. In an action against a terminal carrier to recover for damage to an interstate shipment of horses, evidence of what the shipper paid for the horses is incompetent.\n2. Evidence, \u00a7 430*\u2014when proper foundation laid for introduction of expert evidence as to value of horses. A proper foundation for the admission of evidence of expert witnesses as to the market value of western horses, shipped from a particular reservation in a certain western state, is laid where the witnesses testify that they have knowledge of the market value at the point of destination of western horses of the character, quality and disposition of those owned by plaintiff, even though they do not show that they are acquainted with the market value of horses raised on the par. ticular reservation.\nStafford, Schoede & Stafford, for appellant; M. L. Bell and A. B. Enoch, of counsel.\nJ. T. and S. B. Kenworthy and J. Hays Britton, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0511-01",
  "first_page_order": 537,
  "last_page_order": 538
}
