{
  "id": 5819081,
  "name": "Henry Guth, Appellee, v. George Haas, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Guth v. Haas",
  "decision_date": "1918-02-12",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 6,518",
  "first_page": "437",
  "last_page": "438",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 Ill. App. 437"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 164,
    "char_count": 2219,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.536,
    "sha256": "5ef2c33b117ab4947664f6ebf97f4c4d5aaca32898f06bf0283790b9622e832e",
    "simhash": "1:066b98827b8dabd0",
    "word_count": 391
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:15:15.348169+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry Guth, Appellee, v. George Haas, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dibell\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 1042*\u2014how deficiency in record due to absence of assignment of errors may not be supplied. The deficiency of a record on appeal, due to the failure to attach to or write on the record the assignment of errors, cannot be supplied by printing in the abstract an assignment of errors not in fact upon the record.\n4. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 1042*\u2014when Appellate Court will act upon defect in record on own motion. The defect in the record on review, due to failure to write on or attach to the record the assignment of errors, will be \u2022 acted upon by the Appellate Court, on its own motion; when discovered.\n5. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 1711*\u2014when error waived. A supposed error, not assigned, is waived, and is not open to review by the Appellate Court.\n6. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 601*\u2014how question of sufficiency of evidence may. be raised. The question of sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict or judgment in a case tried by a jury can only be raised by a motion for a new trial.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dibell"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Eagleton, Stone & Islet, for appellant.",
      "Nathan H. Weiss, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry Guth, Appellee, v. George Haas, Appellant.\nGen. No. 6,518.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1042 \u2014how assignments of errors must appear in record. Under rule 12 of the Appellate Court, assignments of errors must be written upon or attached to the record.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1042*\u2014effect of failure, to attach to or write in record assignment of errors. If there is no assignment of errors attached to or written on the record, there is nothing to review.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Clyde E. Stone, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 12, 1918.\nRehearing denied April 16, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Henry Guth, plaintiff, against George Haas, defendant, to recover damages for injuries to the horse, buggy and person of plaintiff by a collision with defendant\u2019s automobile. From a judgment for plaintiff for $700, defendant appeals.\nEagleton, Stone & Islet, for appellant.\nNathan H. Weiss, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vol\u00bb. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0437-01",
  "first_page_order": 463,
  "last_page_order": 464
}
