{
  "id": 5817481,
  "name": "Thomas Skruzewski, Appellee, v. Andrew Rybarezyk, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Skruzewski v. Rybarezyk",
  "decision_date": "1918-04-03",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,446",
  "first_page": "180",
  "last_page": "180",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 Ill. App. 180"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1381,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.559,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.061447019797991e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3192079924350802
    },
    "sha256": "7cc5b02a3803e8265e5e0995534d2b617dc3255532cac3ccef5f525480522a92",
    "simhash": "1:46d40a835005a109",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:15:15.348169+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Thomas Skruzewski, Appellee, v. Andrew Rybarezyk, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor\ndelivered the opinion of the court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William Sherman Stahl, for appellant.",
      "Mbdard A. Kunz, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Thomas Skruzewski, Appellee, v. Andrew Rybarezyk, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,446.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nL Appeal and erbob, \u00a7 1414 \u2014trial judge as better judge of credibility of witnesses. The trial judge who sees the witnesses and hears their testimony Is a better judge in all matters of testimonial credibility than the Appellate Court.\n2. Evidence, \u00a7 476*\u2014\u25a0how preponderance determined. The preponderance of evidence is not necessarily to be determined by the number of witnesses.\n3. Trial, \u00a7 285*\u2014when denial of argument not error. In a trial before the court without a jury, involving a simple matter of fact, the denial of argument does not constitute a breach of discretion.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Dennis W. Sullivan, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 3, 1918.\nRehearing denied April 27, 1918.-\nStatement of the Case.\nAction in assumpsit by Thomas Skruzewsld, plaintiff, against Andrew Rybarezyk, defendant, to recover for labor as a farm hand. From a judgment for plaintiff for $183, defendant appeals.\nWilliam Sherman Stahl, for appellant.\nMbdard A. Kunz, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vote. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0180-01",
  "first_page_order": 206,
  "last_page_order": 206
}
