{
  "id": 5825946,
  "name": "William J. Newman Company, Appellant, v. Sanitary District of Chicago, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "William J. Newman Co. v. Sanitary District of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-13",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,204",
  "first_page": "24",
  "last_page": "24",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 Ill. App. 24"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1497,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.572,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.527646540942415e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3479544560319926
    },
    "sha256": "993a9fc667209cf410151ca8f9221bdbef8d4ce517280b9efba5d87c0dae2485",
    "simhash": "1:db54a1e7586373d4",
    "word_count": 242
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:15:15.348169+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William J. Newman Company, Appellant, v. Sanitary District of Chicago, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Adams, Cbews, Bobb & Wescott, for appellant.",
      "Edmund D. Adcock, for appellee; John F. Bolton, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William J. Newman Company, Appellant, v. Sanitary District of Chicago, Appellee.\nGen. No. 23,204.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBailment, \u00a7 26 \u2014when instruction on care required of bailee is proper. An instruction that \u201cthe court instructs the jury that, as a matter of law the bailee, in a mutual bailment, is not an insurer of the property bailed, but is bound to exercise ordinary and reasonable care, or the care that a reasonably prudent man would take of similar property under similar conditions. If the jury finds such a reasonable care has been exercised, they will return a verdict for the defendant,\u201d held proper, in an action to recover damages for injuries to a machine rented by plaintiff to defendant.\nAppeal from the County Court- of Cook county; the Hon. Andrew D. Webb, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 13, 1918.\nRehearing denied March 25, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by William J. Newman Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against Sanitary District of Chicago, defendant, to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff\u2019s derrick rented to defendant. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.\nAdams, Cbews, Bobb & Wescott, for appellant.\nEdmund D. Adcock, for appellee; John F. Bolton, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0024-01",
  "first_page_order": 50,
  "last_page_order": 50
}