{
  "id": 5822521,
  "name": "Julius Limbach, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jacob Vihon, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Limbach v. Vihon",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-13",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,511",
  "first_page": "73",
  "last_page": "73",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 Ill. App. 73"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1549,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.571,
    "sha256": "3277b73cba3676f8ac7c5c95e1de64895df4eaa11f76b6816d305942225a4712",
    "simhash": "1:0c374a3e150ff2e8",
    "word_count": 251
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:15:15.348169+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Julius Limbach, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jacob Vihon, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice O\u2019Connor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice O\u2019Connor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Julius Limbach, pro se; George F. Ort, of counsel.",
      "William B. O\u2019Brieu and Jacob J. Schwartz, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Julius Limbach, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jacob Vihon, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 23,511.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Attorney and client, \u00a7 149a \u2014what constitutes sufficient notice of attorney's lien. \u25a0 A notice of an attorney\u2019s lien sent by plaintiff to defendant by registered mail, and admittedly received by defendant, constitutes a sufficient compliance with the Act of July 1, 1909, Laws 1909, p. 97 (J. & A. \u00b6 611).\n2. Champerty and maintenance, \u00a7 7*\u2014when contract as to settlement of claim is void. A contract between an attorney and his client providing that the client shall not settle or compromise his claim without the attorney\u2019s consent is void, notwithstanding the contract further provides that if the client should violate any of its provisions he should pay the attorney a certain amount, as such an agreement tends to foster and encourage litigation.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles H. Bowles, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch' Appellate Court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 13, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Julius Limbach, plaintiff, against Jacob Vihon, defendant, to recover $200 for legal services. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.\nJulius Limbach, pro se; George F. Ort, of counsel.\nWilliam B. O\u2019Brieu and Jacob J. Schwartz, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0073-01",
  "first_page_order": 99,
  "last_page_order": 99
}