{
  "id": 5817767,
  "name": "Cable Lumber Company, Appellee, v. Thomas Mack, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cable Lumber Co. v. Mack",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-25",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,876",
  "first_page": "151",
  "last_page": "151",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 Ill. App. 151"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1391,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.561,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.36530276475578305
    },
    "sha256": "97c31973bfeb41678e65bb33971f9bfd54a393b850688204c87a4ada3810f8ad",
    "simhash": "1:015dc584540d08b8",
    "word_count": 232
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:15:15.348169+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Cable Lumber Company, Appellee, v. Thomas Mack, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. C. Thesen, for appellant.",
      "Harry L. Solomon and Joseph H. Landes, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Cable Lumber Company, Appellee, v. Thomas Mack, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,876.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Sales, \u00a7 329 \u2014when delivery and promise of payment shown. In an action to recover the purchase price of lumber claimed to have been sold to defendant, the evidence of plaintiff\u2019s salesman that he sold the lumber to defendant, presented a bill to defendant and that defendant promised him to pay it, and evidence of promises made to the president of defendant and to a lawyer to pay the bill, were sufficient to show delivery and promise of payment.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1772*\u2014when error not ground for reversal. Where substantial justice has been done by a judgment, it will not be reversed because of slight unprejudicial errors.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 25, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Cable Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against Thomas Mack, defendant, to recover for a bill for lumber. From a judgment for plaintiff for $92, defendant appeals.\nL. C. Thesen, for appellant.\nHarry L. Solomon and Joseph H. Landes, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0151-01",
  "first_page_order": 177,
  "last_page_order": 177
}