{
  "id": 5823693,
  "name": "City of Chicago, Appellee, v. Wong Wah, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Wah",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-25",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 24,330",
  "first_page": "161",
  "last_page": "161",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 Ill. App. 161"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 77,
    "char_count": 829,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.513,
    "sha256": "949fe90ed9a19e929088357354d74a95e09a48cab1e1385b66c6479a576a32b9",
    "simhash": "1:36436fb6c6170249",
    "word_count": 137
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:15:15.348169+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of Chicago, Appellee, v. Wong Wah, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "No appearance for appellant.",
      "Harry B. Miller and Daniel Webster, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of Chicago, Appellee, v. Wong Wah, Appellant.\nGen. No. 24,330.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Newcomer, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1918.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 25, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nProsecution by the City of Chicago, plaintiff, against Wong Wah, defendant, for violation of a city ordinance. Defendant, appellant, failed to file the record at the proper term of court. Appellee docketed the cause, filed a short record and moved to affirm the judgment of the Municipal Court.\nThe judgment was affirmed for the reasons given in City of Chicago v. Salmitsky, ante, p. 159.\nNo appearance for appellant.\nHarry B. Miller and Daniel Webster, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0161-01",
  "first_page_order": 187,
  "last_page_order": 187
}