{
  "id": 3016525,
  "name": "Edward Lyman Bill, Inc., Publishers of the Music Trade Review, Appellee, v. Charles H. Leech, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Edward Lyman Bill, Inc. v. Leech",
  "decision_date": "1918-07-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,824",
  "first_page": "578",
  "last_page": "578",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 578"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1439,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.469,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0482681451391715e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5532179675340145
    },
    "sha256": "f69e534bee0cadb7c9814bf05c8f8cc57ed9e0f667ace38fac9fe129e2001d85",
    "simhash": "1:6337c2b7504b01dc",
    "word_count": 231
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edward Lyman Bill, Inc., Publishers of the Music Trade Review, Appellee, v. Charles H. Leech, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thomson\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thomson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Samuel B. Hill, for appellant.",
      "Culver, Andrews, King & Stitt, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edward Lyman Bill, Inc., Publishers of the Music Trade Review, Appellee, v. Charles H. Leech, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,824.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Corporations, \u00a7 516 \u2014 when contract with corporation is shown. In an action to recover on a contract, evidence held sufficient to support a finding that the contract was entered into with plaintiff, a corporation, and not with an individual having the same name as the corporation.\n2. Corporations, \u00a7 769a* \u2014 when defendant must show that plaintiff is not authorised to do business in State. Where defendant, in an action by a corporation, sets up that plaintiff is not a corporation authorized to do business in the State, the burden of establishing this defense is on defendant.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Dennis W. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in 'the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed July 10, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Edward Lyman Bill, Inc., Publishers of the Music Trade Review, plaintiff, against Charles H. Leech, defendant, to recover under a contract for advertising. From a judgment for plaintiff for $262.08, defendant appeals.\nSamuel B. Hill, for appellant.\nCulver, Andrews, King & Stitt, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0578-01",
  "first_page_order": 632,
  "last_page_order": 632
}
