{
  "id": 3025443,
  "name": "Edson R. Gilbert and William H. Dunn, Appellants, v. Robert M. Sweitzer, County Clerk, et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gilbert v. Sweitzer",
  "decision_date": "1918-06-14",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,630",
  "first_page": "438",
  "last_page": "439",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 438"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 164,
    "char_count": 1900,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "sha256": "f2dd35c279aca99841ce2b762baa8534ff23556d0b7a9cc6617125f86043bae6",
    "simhash": "1:097fdb81dc99b180",
    "word_count": 306
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edson R. Gilbert and William H. Dunn, Appellants, v. Robert M. Sweitzer, County Clerk, et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Matchett\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Matchett"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles S. McNett, for appellants.",
      "Maclay Hoyne and Robert E. Hogan, for appellees; Holt, Cutting & Sidley, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edson R. Gilbert and William H. Dunn, Appellants, v. Robert M. Sweitzer, County Clerk, et al., Appellees.\nGen. No. 23,630.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Becision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1718 \u2014 what constitutes waiver of constitutional Questions. An appeal to the Appellate Court constitutes a waiver of all questions as to the constitutionality of statutes raised in the court below.\n2. Injunction, \u00a7 191* \u2014 when Mil to enjoin payment of salaries to probation officers under Juvenile Court Act is insufficient. Bill to enjoin payment of salaries of probation officers appointed under the Juvenile Court Act on the ground that such appointment was made by the judges without request from the clerk of the Circuit Court, and was without warrant of law; that the order of appointment designated such officers by names descriptive of the duties to he performed by them, such as \u201cDirector Juvenile Psychopathic Institute,\u201d etc., and that the act was being maladministered, held insufficient to state a cause of action.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Martin M. Gridley, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 14, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill by Edson R. Gilbert and William H. Dunn, complainants, against Robert M. Sweitzer, as county clerk of Cook county, and Henry Stuckart, as county treasurer, defendants, to enjoin the payment of salaries to 115 persons holding positions as probation officers in the Juvenile Court of Cook county. From a decree dismissing the bill for want of equity, complainants appeal.\nCharles S. McNett, for appellants.\nMaclay Hoyne and Robert E. Hogan, for appellees; Holt, Cutting & Sidley, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0438-01",
  "first_page_order": 492,
  "last_page_order": 493
}
