{
  "id": 3022755,
  "name": "John Chylewski, Defendant in Error, v. City of Chicago, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chylewski v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1918-06-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,529",
  "first_page": "389",
  "last_page": "390",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 389"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1389,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.542,
    "sha256": "2af5c234e91d734a35226b6e1eaea2b0beeaebc9dd6da002618194f3f576f15e",
    "simhash": "1:475963b0daa9a198",
    "word_count": 226
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John Chylewski, Defendant in Error, v. City of Chicago, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dever\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dever"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Samuel A. Ettelson, for plaintiff in error; Roy S. Gaskill, of counsel.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John Chylewski, Defendant in Error, v. City of Chicago, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 23,529.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1918.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed June 10, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nPetition of mandamus by John Chylewski, petitioner, against City of Chicago, respondent, to compel respondent to restore petitioner to a position in the police department of the City of Chicago as patrolman. From a judgment in petitioner\u2019s favor, respondent brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Evidence, \u00a7 10 \u2014 what not judicially noticed. Courts will not take judicial notice of the provisions of municipal ordinances, and the duty is imposed' upon persons relying on such ordinances to allege and prove them.\n2. Civil service, \u00a7 28* \u2014 when patrolman guilty of laches in seeking reinstatement. One seeking reinstatement by mandamus to the office of police patrolman from which he has been discharged is guilty of laches where he delays seeking relief for more than 5 years.\nSamuel A. Ettelson, for plaintiff in error; Roy S. Gaskill, of counsel.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0389-01",
  "first_page_order": 443,
  "last_page_order": 444
}
