{
  "id": 3015886,
  "name": "Western Iron Construction Company, Appellee, v. S. A. Sternfeld and Harry N. Sternfeld, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Western Iron Construction Co. v. Sternfeld",
  "decision_date": "1918-07-01",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,032",
  "first_page": "509",
  "last_page": "510",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 509"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1473,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "sha256": "e23c4ebc9fe2c925bf3a79670ab3c28cc13703226599280f9a2475e3e0a4102d",
    "simhash": "1:4cad03a158ada3d2",
    "word_count": 242
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Western Iron Construction Company, Appellee, v. S. A. Sternfeld and Harry N. Sternfeld, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stedman & Soelke, for appellants.",
      "I. B. Perlman, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Western Iron Construction Company, Appellee, v. S. A. Sternfeld and Harry N. Sternfeld, Appellants.\nGen. No. 21,032.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry P. Dolan, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1918.\nReversed with judgment of nil capiat and for costs.\nOpinion filed July 1, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Western Iron Construction Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against S. A. Sternfeld and Harry N. \u2018Sternfeld, defendants, to recover the contract price of 90 angle irons. From a judgment for plaintiff for $176.95, defendants appeal.\nStedman & Soelke, for appellants.\nI. B. Perlman, for appellee.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Sales, \u00a7 126 \u2014 when delivery not shown. In an action to recover the purchase price of a certain number of angle irons, evidence held insufficient to show delivery of a portion of the irons by an expressman at the building at which defendants were working.\n2. Sales, \u00a7 126* \u2014 wrfiat does not constitute delivery of angle irons to building contractors. The mere placing by an expressman of angle irons, for use in a building under construction, in the street alongside the curb, does not constitute a delivery to the contractors, if no one representing the latter received the irons or checked them up.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0509-01",
  "first_page_order": 563,
  "last_page_order": 564
}
