{
  "id": 3022420,
  "name": "Alexander H. Revell & Company, Appellant, v. C. H. Morgan Grocery Company, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Alexander H. Revell & Co. v. C. H. Morgan Grocery Co.",
  "decision_date": "1918-05-14",
  "docket_number": "Gen. Ho. 24,057",
  "first_page": "265",
  "last_page": "266",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 265"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1589,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.52,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4371330143185954
    },
    "sha256": "6ac732646cbc56ee94b6cbd85cb3ba8c2543d19d69cacea8eb580a1ae11a98c7",
    "simhash": "1:581dd3a4442d4ad8",
    "word_count": 267
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Alexander H. Revell & Company, Appellant, v. C. H. Morgan Grocery Company, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Muni on?al Court of Chicago, \u00a7 21a \u2014 when approval of appeal bond is insufficient. An approval of an appeal bond by a trial judge of the Municipal Court of Chicago by writing his name thereon under the word \u201capproved,\u201d and without an order of approval, is insufficient.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ernest Kasischke and Edwy Logan Reeves, for appellant.",
      "Allen & Ward, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Alexander H. Revell & Company, Appellant, v. C. H. Morgan Grocery Company, Appellee.\nGen. Ho. 24,057.\n(Hot to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Court op Chicago, \u00a7 21a \u2014 applicability of sections 92 and 93 of Practice Act as to approval of appeal bonds to. Sections 92, 93 of the Practice Act (J. & A. HI 8629, 8630), relating to the approval of appeal bonds by an order of court or by the clerk, when authorized by the court, apply to appeals from Municipal Court of Chicago as well as to other courts of record.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry P. Dolan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1918.\nDismissed.\nOpinion filed May 14, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Alexander H. Revell & Company, plaintiff, against C. H. Morgan Grocery Company, a corporation, defendant. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appealed and defendant made a motion to dismiss the appeal.\nErnest Kasischke and Edwy Logan Reeves, for appellant.\nAllen & Ward, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI tp XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0265-01",
  "first_page_order": 319,
  "last_page_order": 320
}
