{
  "id": 3018614,
  "name": "P. R. McLeod, trading as McLeod & Company, Appellant, v. Alexander J. Alexander and Lucas Brodhead, Trustees, Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "McLeod v. Alexander",
  "decision_date": "1918-06-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,821",
  "first_page": "485",
  "last_page": "486",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 485"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1577,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.528,
    "sha256": "0ac63d2164b93bab94d8baf83f843eea1246f9887f03c5a10401fd866f8cba52",
    "simhash": "1:854de3801929a235",
    "word_count": 253
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "P. R. McLeod, trading as McLeod & Company, Appellant, v. Alexander J. Alexander and Lucas Brodhead, Trustees, Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice O\u2019Connor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Appeal and erbob, \u00a7 1410 \u2014 when judgment not distwrbed as against weight of evidence. In an action for the purchase price of goods where the evidence is conflicting and the Appellate Court cannot say that the finding was manifestly against the weight of the evidence, the' judgment will be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice O\u2019Connor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Barnhardt & Stafford, for appellant.",
      "Ernest Severy, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "P. R. McLeod, trading as McLeod & Company, Appellant, v. Alexander J. Alexander and Lucas Brodhead, Trustees, Appellees.\nGen. No. 23,821.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Account stated, \u00a7 4 \u2014 what does not constitute. The mere sending of monthly statements of account does not make an account stated if the goods for which they were sent were not purchased.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry P. Dolan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 19, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by P. E. McLeod, trading as McLeod & Company, plaintiff, against Alexander J. Alexander and Lucas Brodhead, trustees of the estate of Alexander J. Alexander, and Ashland Block Association, a corporation, defendants, to recover an amount claimed to be due as the purchase price of certain goods. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.\nBarnhardt & Stafford, for appellant.\nErnest Severy, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0485-01",
  "first_page_order": 539,
  "last_page_order": 540
}
