{
  "id": 3020897,
  "name": "Norman Carroll, Appellee, v. A. Goldstein, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carroll v. Goldstein",
  "decision_date": "1918-05-15",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,643",
  "first_page": "315",
  "last_page": "315",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 315"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1715,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.518,
    "sha256": "fec905c899349630a37318ae97570b1a5e9a7996ed14b0ccb6ba01697950d7c3",
    "simhash": "1:cd5184f35468b988",
    "word_count": 285
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Norman Carroll, Appellee, v. A. Goldstein, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bernard J. Brown, for appellant.",
      "Montgomery, Hart & Smith, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Norman Carroll, Appellee, v. A. Goldstein, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,643.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Brokers, \u00a7 105 \u2014 when property owner is hound to purchase property of another through latter's agent. Where a property owner states to a real estate agent that he will purchase certain property at a specified price which is held for sale by the latter if the latter will procure the sale of the former\u2019s property, there is an offer in the nature of a continuing offer on such property owner\u2019s part, and, if the offer is not previously withdrawn, the moment the agent furnishes the consideration by rendering services resulting in the sale of the owner\u2019s property, there comes into existence a unilateral contract, executed on the agent\u2019s part and binding the owner to purchase the property held by the agent.\n2. Frauds, Statute of, \u00a7 130* \u2014 when defense of may not first he raised. Where the Statute of Frauds is not mentioned as a defense in the affidavit of merits below, it cannot be considered in the Appellate Court.\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county;, the Hon. David T. Smiley, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed May 15, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Norman Carroll, plaintiff, against A. Goldstein, defendant, to recover damages for a breach of a contract to purchase certain real estate. From a judgment for plaintiff for $437.50, defendant appeals.\nBernard J. Brown, for appellant.\nMontgomery, Hart & Smith, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0315-01",
  "first_page_order": 369,
  "last_page_order": 369
}
