{
  "id": 3015839,
  "name": "Frank Lopata, Appellee, v. John Jaros, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lopata v. Jaros",
  "decision_date": "1918-07-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,909",
  "first_page": "546",
  "last_page": "547",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 546"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 993,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.578,
    "sha256": "c0901d70883e85915732c6343d4f601c889e39e471a586e1c56f65b846ae49c5",
    "simhash": "1:43664d91788bb8da",
    "word_count": 160
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank Lopata, Appellee, v. John Jaros, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edward J. Herdlicka, for appellant.",
      "Ryan & Lewis, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Frank Lopata, Appellee, v. John Jaros, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,909.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edwabd T. Wade, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed July 10, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Frank Lopata, plaintiff, against John Jaros, defendant, to recover a balance claimed to be due for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff for $480.86, defendant appeals.\nEdward J. Herdlicka, for appellant.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSaxes, \u00a7 329 \u2014 when evidence supports verdict in action for balance of purchase price. In an action to recover a balance claimed to be due for goods sold and delivered, evidence held sufficient to support a verdict for plaintiff.\nRyan & Lewis, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Yols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0546-01",
  "first_page_order": 600,
  "last_page_order": 601
}
