{
  "id": 3026337,
  "name": "George Hutton, Appellee, v. Albert Miller and E. P. Miller, trading as Albert Miller & Company, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hutton v. Miller",
  "decision_date": "1918-06-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 24,013",
  "first_page": "399",
  "last_page": "399",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 399"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1614,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.545,
    "sha256": "4d601188ec0d51f83e904e5987bba556b93181b3bb05283e9b4b77c3e4f6fe6f",
    "simhash": "1:41f35807b20c31f8",
    "word_count": 263
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George Hutton, Appellee, v. Albert Miller and E. P. Miller, trading as Albert Miller & Company, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr.- Justice Dever\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr.- Justice Dever"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Teller & Pennish, for appellants.",
      "W. K. Pattison, for appellee; Douglas C. Gregg, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George Hutton, Appellee, v. Albert Miller and E. P. Miller, trading as Albert Miller & Company, Appellants.\nGen. No. 24,013.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nPrincipal and agent, \u00a7 113 \u2014 when principal may recover proceeds of sale of property from person procuring property from agent. In an action to recover for goods sold by a broker, where it appears that the plaintiff shipped the goods through his agent, that the latter, of his own motion, turned over the bills of lading, which were made out to plaintiff, to a third person who forwarded them to defendant, that when defendant attempted to credit such third person\u2019s account with the proceeds of the sale of the goods, the latter notified defendant that the goods were plaintiff\u2019s property and that defendant knew that such third person frequently acted as agent for others, held that plaintiff was entitled to recover the proceeds of the sale of the property.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hem. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1918.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 10, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by George Hutton, plaintiff, against Albert Miller and E. P. Miller, copartners, trading as Albert Miller & Company, defendants, for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff for $198.73, defendants appeal.\nTeller & Pennish, for appellants.\nW. K. Pattison, for appellee; Douglas C. Gregg, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, anti Cumulative Quarterly, game topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0399-01",
  "first_page_order": 453,
  "last_page_order": 453
}
