{
  "id": 3025902,
  "name": "The J. L. Mott Iron Works, Appellee, v. Nathan Rosenzweig and Maimonides Hospital. Nathan Rosenzweig, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "J. L. Mott Iron Works v. Rosenzweig",
  "decision_date": "1918-06-14",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,668",
  "first_page": "430",
  "last_page": "431",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 430"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 966,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.52,
    "sha256": "460856dea7b294046f75b1b405eca08a08d439d015cd084d23c2753ecee47201",
    "simhash": "1:67fb1cd176ab059d",
    "word_count": 151
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The J. L. Mott Iron Works, Appellee, v. Nathan Rosenzweig and Maimonides Hospital. Nathan Rosenzweig, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hyman Soboroff, for appellant.",
      "Bryan, McCormick & Wilber, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The J. L. Mott Iron Works, Appellee, v. Nathan Rosenzweig and Maimonides Hospital. Nathan Rosenzweig, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,668.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Wells M. Cook, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 14, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by The J. L. Mott Iron Works, plaintiff, against Nathan Rosenzweig and Maimonides Hospital, defendants, to recover on a note. From a judgment for plaintiff for $1,902.05, defendant Rosenzweig appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBills and notes, \u00a7 433* \u2014 when parol evidence is inadmissible. Parol evidence is inadmissible to contradict or vary the contract implied from the indorsement of a note by showing that the indorser was to incur no liability thereon.\nHyman Soboroff, for appellant.\nBryan, McCormick & Wilber, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0430-01",
  "first_page_order": 484,
  "last_page_order": 485
}