{
  "id": 3026095,
  "name": "Abraham Lepine, Appellee, v. Chicago Waste Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lepine v. Chicago Waste Co.",
  "decision_date": "1918-07-01",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 24,244",
  "first_page": "507",
  "last_page": "508",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. App. 507"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1337,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.503,
    "sha256": "a52cb61ecda8fd64df38c4bdf054dc535281242cd22ba28ebffd104b5dd8351c",
    "simhash": "1:4dca4e56d89bbcf8",
    "word_count": 211
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:38.810297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Abraham Lepine, Appellee, v. Chicago Waste Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Dever\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Dever"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Richard J. Cooney and John A. Verhoeven, for appellant.",
      "Abraham: Lepine, pro se."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Abraham Lepine, Appellee, v. Chicago Waste Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 24,244.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAttorney and client, \u00a7 135 \u2014 what evidence is improperly excluded in action for services. In an action by an attorney for legal services in obtaining information relative to alleged thefts from defendant and in aiding to prosecute certain persons, where there was evidence that a certain person was a client of plaintiff, evidence was improperly excluded which tended to show that plaintiff\u2019s interest in the case was for the purpose of protecting such person in a controversy with another who, it was intimated, received certain property which it was charged was stolen from defendant\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph P. Rafferty, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1918.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed July 1, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Abraham Lepine, plaintiff, against Chicago Waste Company, defendant, for legal services. - From a judgment for plaintiff for $200, defendant appeals.\nRichard J. Cooney and John A. Verhoeven, for appellant.\nAbraham: Lepine, pro se.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, Sam' topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0507-01",
  "first_page_order": 561,
  "last_page_order": 562
}