#### James W. Gustat, appellee, v. Daniel Hayes Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 24,662.

Judgment for plaintiff in ex parte hearing after denial of defendant’s motion for continuance alleged to have been in violation of Rule 12 of the Circuit Court. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1918.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 10, 1919.

Thomas Lindskog, for appellant. Archibald Cattell and Carl A. Waldron, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.