{
  "id": 5463199,
  "name": "William H. Wohlberg, Appellee, v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wohlberg v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1919-03-18",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 24,207",
  "first_page": "389",
  "last_page": "390",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "213 Ill. App. 389"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "285 Ill. 306",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        4925647
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/285/0306-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1977,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.536,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15986491876553421
    },
    "sha256": "11942f8c1a6db7db51439dd9b4c2118f08b1a944ccaa37995bd7dcbb6b5b6ecb",
    "simhash": "1:2c575c1500ad6e58",
    "word_count": 313
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:37:55.679199+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William H. Wohlberg, Appellee, v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is an appeal by defendant, the Merchants Reserve Life Insurance Company, from a judgment against it for $4,679.43, entered on a directed verdict, in an action of the first class brought in the Municipal Court of Chicago.\nPlaintiff (appellee) has filed a motion to strike from the record the original stenographic report which was filed in lieu of a copy thereof, without the requisite stipulation authorizing such procedure. This motion was reserved to the hearing.\nThe question presented by said motion having been decided in the recent case of Marshall Field & Co. v. Nyman, 285 Ill. 306, in favor of plaintiff\u2019s contention here, the motion must be allowed.\nThe original stenographic report will therefore be stricken from the record; and there being no question presented by the common-law record before us, the judgment will be affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gideon S. Thompson, for appellant.",
      "Channing L. Sentz, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William H. Wohlberg, Appellee, v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 24,207.\n1. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 26 \u2014when original stenographic report stricken from files. The original stenographic report having been filed in lieu of a copy thereof, without the requisite stipulation authorizing such procedure, it will be stricken from the files on motion of appellee.\n2. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 31 \u2014when judgment affirmed. The stenographic report, filed as part of the record upon appeal from the Municipal Court, having been stricken from the files on motion of appellee, and the common-law record presenting no question to the court, the judgment will be affirmed.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Howard Hates, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1918.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 18, 1919.\nGideon S. Thompson, for appellant.\nChanning L. Sentz, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0389-01",
  "first_page_order": 421,
  "last_page_order": 422
}