{
  "id": 5460754,
  "name": "James W. Gustat, appellee, v. Daniel Hayes Company, appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gustat v. Daniel Hayes Co.",
  "decision_date": "1919-03-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 24,662",
  "first_page": "675",
  "last_page": "675",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "213 Ill. App. 675"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 69,
    "char_count": 560,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "sha256": "310626c117d81549ba43c2c5d0820c7ccc96a51441ddb7d6c5ab7ef98a0c286b",
    "simhash": "1:31c342249ca29c18",
    "word_count": 90
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:37:55.679199+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James W. Gustat, appellee, v. Daniel Hayes Company, appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thomas Lindskog, for appellant. Archibald Cattell and Carl A. Waldron, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James W. Gustat, appellee, v. Daniel Hayes Company, appellant.\nGen. No. 24,662.\nJudgment for plaintiff in ex parte hearing after denial of defendant\u2019s motion for continuance alleged to have been in violation of Rule 12 of the Circuit Court. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1918.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 10, 1919.\nThomas Lindskog, for appellant. Archibald Cattell and Carl A. Waldron, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0675-03",
  "first_page_order": 707,
  "last_page_order": 707
}