{
  "id": 4918102,
  "name": "Herbert E. Bucklen v. A. Reeves Jackson",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bucklen v. Jackson",
  "decision_date": "1887-05-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "521",
  "last_page": "521",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "22 Ill. App. 521"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1487,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "sha256": "5df21989e59417b63fb5af4f53ea4403b289946013acb651a4429ec82b5e5ffe",
    "simhash": "1:569feaf79b7a428f",
    "word_count": 254
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:35:06.436292+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Herbert E. Bucklen v. A. Reeves Jackson."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellee recovered a judgment of $16 against appellant for professional services as a surgeon rendered to a laborer who fell and was injured while at work on appellant\u2019s building. Ap pedant went to appellee\u2019s office and requested him to come to his building and attend to the man who was injured. Appellee testified that appellant said that he would see him paid for his services and that he charged the bill to him on his books.\nAppellant denies that he promised to see appellee paid or used any other words indicating an intention to be responsible in any way for the services. There was a sharp conflict of evidence and the jury was correctly instructed by the court, at appellant\u2019s request, on every question arising in the case. Ho instructions were given in behalf of appellee. There being evidence to support the verdict and no error of law, this court, under the well established rule, will not interfere unless the verdict is manifestly against the weight of evidence. Such is not the case here and the judgment must therefore be affirmed.\nJudgment affirtried.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Weigley, Bulkley & Gbay, for appellant.",
      "Mr. B. M. Mura, for appellee"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Herbert E. Bucklen v. A. Reeves Jackson.\nPractice \u2014 Conflict of Evidence.\nWhere there is a sharp conflict of evidence and there is no error of law, this court will not interfere with the verdict of the jury.\n[Opinion filed May 18, 1887.]\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Joseph E. Gaby, Jpdge, presiding.\nMessrs. Weigley, Bulkley & Gbay, for appellant.\nMr. B. M. Mura, for appellee"
  },
  "file_name": "0521-01",
  "first_page_order": 519,
  "last_page_order": 519
}