{
  "id": 3052011,
  "name": "S. M. Ford, appellee, v. Ford Manufacturing Company, appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ford v. Ford Manufacturing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1922-02-14",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 26,371",
  "first_page": "639",
  "last_page": "640",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "224 Ill. App. 639"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 65,
    "char_count": 548,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "sha256": "ce4748d5ebc26c7fb1006916269e964785bd1be3fdbaf4e4d0233ff68bddebc9",
    "simhash": "1:90237f16502718ad",
    "word_count": 85
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:42:04.180465+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "S. M. Ford, appellee, v. Ford Manufacturing Company, appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Morrill\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Morrill"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Litsinger, Healy & Reid, for appellant; James J. Einn, of counsel. Luby & Ewen, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "S. M. Ford, appellee, v. Ford Manufacturing Company, appellant.\nGen. No. 26,371.\nAction for royalties due for use of a patent. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1920.\nReversed and remanded.'\nOpinion filed February 14, 1922.\nRehearing denied February 25, 1922.\nLitsinger, Healy & Reid, for appellant; James J. Einn, of counsel. Luby & Ewen, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0639-05",
  "first_page_order": 673,
  "last_page_order": 674
}