{
  "id": 3072843,
  "name": "William A. Conway, trading as Conway Coke & Coal Company, appellee, v. Frank K. Reilly, appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Conway v. Reilly",
  "decision_date": "1923-03-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 28,081",
  "first_page": "638",
  "last_page": "638",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "229 Ill. App. 638"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 618,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.48,
    "sha256": "32e647ba84babcc55172b1b31061a5e369720cd8b6fe6a1789fe7cc442c4ffba",
    "simhash": "1:14af6ab3f4998e6d",
    "word_count": 96
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:58:10.930407+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William A. Conway, trading as Conway Coke & Coal Company, appellee, v. Frank K. Reilly, appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George L. Reker and Thomas W. Reilly, for appellant. Pomeroy & Martin, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William A. Conway, trading as Conway Coke & Coal Company, appellee, v. Frank K. Reilly, appellant.\nGen. No. 28,081.\nSuit for price of coal sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles F. McKinley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1922.\nAffirmed with damages.\nOpinion filed March 19, 1923.\nRehearing denied April 2, 1923.\nCertiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).\nGeorge L. Reker and Thomas W. Reilly, for appellant. Pomeroy & Martin, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0638-03",
  "first_page_order": 664,
  "last_page_order": 664
}