{
  "id": 5535404,
  "name": "N. Lapidus et al., trading as M. Lapidus & Sons, appellants, v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lapidus v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1926-06-14",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 30,470",
  "first_page": "620",
  "last_page": "620",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "242 Ill. App. 620"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 74,
    "char_count": 618,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.562,
    "sha256": "7bba69ec261d269fca43c63e73f07487683e8e8035bc917f2c4e1dc20ef4fda8",
    "simhash": "1:11d5f43c9087be0c",
    "word_count": 101
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:47.619316+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "N. Lapidus et al., trading as M. Lapidus & Sons, appellants, v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "H. C. Lust, for appellants; R. A. Zwemer, of counsel.",
      "Lee J. Frank and C. P. Hamill, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "N. Lapidus et al., trading as M. Lapidus & Sons, appellants, v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, appellee.\nGen. No. 30,470.\nAction for breach of contract of carriage. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. James J. O \u2019Toole, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 14, 1926.\nRehearing denied June 29, 1926.\nH. C. Lust, for appellants; R. A. Zwemer, of counsel.\nLee J. Frank and C. P. Hamill, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0620-02",
  "first_page_order": 654,
  "last_page_order": 654
}