{
  "id": 5607190,
  "name": "In re Estate of Iva Schwaebel (George T. Schwaebel, Appellant.)",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Estate of Schwaebel",
  "decision_date": "1930-05-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "19",
  "last_page": "19",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "258 Ill. App. 19"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "334 Ill. 115",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5220645
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/334/0115-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "314 Ill. 360",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5130684
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/314/0360-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 95,
    "char_count": 1063,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.536,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.16277145887655997
    },
    "sha256": "166441f329923cd233b5d2241a36c90e5bf02b39f200fe045930c21c013efa65",
    "simhash": "1:8bcc9dd7c0dbdf11",
    "word_count": 182
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:15.180886+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re Estate of Iva Schwaebel (George T. Schwaebel, Appellant.)"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barry\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is an appeal from an order admitting to probate the alleged will of Iva Sehwaebel. There were two subscribing witnesses, neither of whom testified that they believed the testatrix was of sound mind and memory at the time of the execution of the alleged will. Under the statute the attesting witnesses must declare on oath that they believed the testatrix was of sound mind and memory when the will was executed or acknowledged and in the absence of such proof the will should be denied probate; Thornton v. Herndon, 314 Ill. 360; Martin v. Martin, 334 Ill. 115-131. In the state of the proof the court erred in admitting the will to probate. The order is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the circuit court to enter an order denying the probate of the alleged will.\nReversed and remanded with directions.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barry"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Turner & Holder, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re Estate of Iva Schwaebel (George T. Schwaebel, Appellant.)\nHeard in this court at the February term, 1930.\nOpinion filed May 21, 1930.\nTurner & Holder, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0019-01",
  "first_page_order": 45,
  "last_page_order": 45
}