{
  "id": 4955442,
  "name": "Michael Reich v. Adelaide N. Berdel et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Reich v. Berdel",
  "decision_date": "1888-09-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "265",
  "last_page": "266",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "27 Ill. App. 265"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1109,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "sha256": "c9764b31ad075fd78261706c855cc081f8077ee875fdf1a104273853e32fc8b0",
    "simhash": "1:d19ea52644e11a17",
    "word_count": 184
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:38:40.638408+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Michael Reich v. Adelaide N. Berdel et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Moran, P. J.\nThis is an appeal from a decree assessing damages on the dissolution of an injunction which had been sued out by appellant. The record shows only a suggestion of damages, and that the damages were assessed at \u00a7164.75. It does not appear that the court heard any evidence showing the nature or extent of the damages nor how they arose.\nIt has been repeatedly held a judgment for such damages can not be supported on appeal, unless the evidence authorizing the judgment is preserved in the record. There is noth, ing whatever to support this decree for damages, and it must therefore be reversed and the case remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Moran, P. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Blum & Blum, for appellant.",
      "Mr. E. A. Sherburne, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Michael Reich v. Adelaide N. Berdel et al.\nInjunctions \u2014 Dissolution\u2014Damages\u2014Appeal\u2014Record.\nA judgment for damages assessed on the dissolution of an injunction, can not be supported on appeal, unless the evidence authorizing it is preserved in the record.\n[Opinion filed September 18, 1888.]\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the lion. Egbert Jamieson, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Blum & Blum, for appellant.\nMr. E. A. Sherburne, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0265-01",
  "first_page_order": 261,
  "last_page_order": 262
}