{
  "id": 4952886,
  "name": "George Hosmer et al. v. Marcus Teller",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hosmer v. Teller",
  "decision_date": "1888-12-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "488",
  "last_page": "489",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "27 Ill. App. 488"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 150,
    "char_count": 1830,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.443,
    "sha256": "14f4e5654fad25f1eb54112e33b2efc63dd993f2fe1c341112f41355c4095447",
    "simhash": "1:b618f6f81a269481",
    "word_count": 303
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:38:40.638408+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George Hosmer et al. v. Marcus Teller."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellants commenced an action by attach meat against appellee, the grounds stated in the affidavit being that appellee had within two years preceding the filing of the affidavit fraudulently conveyed or assigned his effects or a part thereof so as to hinder and delay his creditors, etc. Appellee traversed the allegations of fraud. On the trial, after the plaintiffs had rested, the court instructed the jury that, under the evidence, their verdict as to the attachment issue should be for the defendant.\nPlaintiffs appeal, and assign the giving of said instruction for error. We have examined and considered the evidence introduced by appellants in support of the allegations of fraud contained in the affidavit, and while there were some acts of appellee that may have furnished ground for suspicion, we are of opinion that there was no evidence which would justify a verdict against appellee on the fraud issue. It can not be said, perhaps, that there was not some slight evidence, but we are of opinion that a verdict based on it could not be sustained, but would have to he set aside by the court. Such being the case, the court properly instructed the jury to find for the defendant on said fraud issue, and the judgment must be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Holzheimbr, Eliel & Eoserthal, for appellants.",
      "Mr. W. A. Sohoreeld, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George Hosmer et al. v. Marcus Teller.\nAttachment \u2014 Instruction to Find for the Defendant \u2014 Practice.\nThis court sustains the action of the court below in instructing the Jury, at the close of the plaintiff's case, fo find for the defendant as to the attachment issue, the evidence being insufficient to sustain a verdict for the plaintiffs.\n[Opinion filed December 7, 1888.]\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Holzheimbr, Eliel & Eoserthal, for appellants.\nMr. W. A. Sohoreeld, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0488-01",
  "first_page_order": 484,
  "last_page_order": 485
}