{
  "id": 4970312,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, for use, etc., v. William W. Foster et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Foster",
  "decision_date": "1888-11-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "208",
  "last_page": "209",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "29 Ill. App. 208"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1705,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "sha256": "212226fe1243de596afb3c1a390e63c326ff8b594d0c767d9b980f8d68d9a384",
    "simhash": "1:817e14fffa871ebf",
    "word_count": 281
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:26:47.112254+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, for use, etc., v. William W. Foster et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis was an action of debt on the official bond of the sheriff of Macon county, to recover various sums unlawfully retained by the sheriff, as alleged, and sundry amounts illegally claimed by the sheriff, as alleged, and allowed him by the county board.'\nThe declaration contained twenty-seven breaches. To the greater number of these breaches a demurrer was sustained, and to certain pleas which were interposed to remaining breaches a demurrer was overruled, and final judgment was rendered against the plaintiffs.\nSeveral important questions of law aris.e upon these rulings, and it seems important that there should be an authoritative settlement of these questions as early as possible. While we are not entirely satisfied with the conclusion of the Circuit Court as to some of the points involved, we deem it advisable to affirm the judgment in order that the ease may go to the Supreme Court without the delay and expense that would be occasioned by a reversal in this court.\nThe judgment will therefore be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Edward P. Vail, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Johns & Randolph, Crea & Ewing, Mills Bros., and Bunn & Park, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, for use, etc., v. William W. Foster et al.\nSheriff\u2014Bond\u2014Debt\u2014Practice.\nIn an action upon a sheriff\u2019s bond to recover moneys alleged to be unlawfully retained by him, this court, in consideration of the importance of the question involved, declines to interfere with the judgment for defendant, with a, view to expediting a consideration of the case by the Supreme Court.\n[Opinion filed November 23, 1888.]\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Macon County; the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.\nMr. Edward P. Vail, for appellant.\nMessrs. Johns & Randolph, Crea & Ewing, Mills Bros., and Bunn & Park, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0208-01",
  "first_page_order": 204,
  "last_page_order": 205
}