{
  "id": 2420839,
  "name": "Edwin Hinchliffe, Impleaded, etc., v. Selmer Espen and Sigmund Ruthstadt",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hinchliffe v. Espen",
  "decision_date": "1889-03-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "371",
  "last_page": "372",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "30 Ill. App. 371"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "18 Ill. App. 366",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        864971
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/18/0366-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1100,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.493,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.47105198025058603
    },
    "sha256": "807a31b73992e89caf043972ab431628851adf5d4fe3c89216c0e3ac81a3ce95",
    "simhash": "1:1ddb29a68ee519b9",
    "word_count": 186
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:02:08.632983+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edwin Hinchliffe, Impleaded, etc., v. Selmer Espen and Sigmund Ruthstadt."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Gary, J.\nThis was an action for a forcible detainer by appellees, in which the appellant was joined with his sub-tenants, who were in possession, under Sec. 15 of the act of 1874.\nThis section does not warrant a judgment against the original tenant, out of possession when the suit was begun. The judgment is required to be according as their actual holdings shall be found to be.\nThere is some ambiguity in the section, but language unequivocal would be necessary to make a party guilty of forcibly detaining what he did not hold at all. Godard v. Lieberman, 18 Ill. App. 366.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Gary, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. E. A. Sherburne, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Hofheimer, Zeisler & Rosenberg, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edwin Hinchliffe, Impleaded, etc., v. Selmer Espen and Sigmund Ruthstadt.\nLandlord and Tenant\u2014Forcible Detainer\u2014Sec. 15, Act of 1874.\nSec. 15 of the act of 1874 does not warrant a judgment in forcible . detainer against the original tenant, if he was out of possession when the suit was begun.\n[Opinion filed March 13, 1889.]\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.\nMr. E. A. Sherburne, for appellant.\nMessrs. Hofheimer, Zeisler & Rosenberg, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0371-01",
  "first_page_order": 367,
  "last_page_order": 368
}
