{
  "id": 2422335,
  "name": "B. M. Shaffner v. P. B. S. Pinchback",
  "name_abbreviation": "Shaffner v. Pinchback",
  "decision_date": "1889-03-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "355",
  "last_page": "356",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "30 Ill. App. 355"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "23 Ill. 493",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5803359
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/23/0493-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "3 Den. 340",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Denio",
      "case_ids": [
        2187500
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/denio/3/0340-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "3 Den. 107",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Denio",
      "case_ids": [
        2187479
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/denio/3/0107-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "51 Ill. 184",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        816393
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/51/0184-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1325,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.518,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.298132930532853e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3329147761124297
    },
    "sha256": "d4481529c161572db81a46010d5f242ad145bd02903f052217eec17a0616514d",
    "simhash": "1:15f1e99e58cec203",
    "word_count": 237
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:02:08.632983+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "B. M. Shaffner v. P. B. S. Pinchback."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Gary, J.\nMoney advanced, either as a loan or on joint account, to bet on a horse race, can not be recovered, whether the receiver won or lost, whatever excuse or pretense he may offer for not repaying it.\nThe principle of Mosher v. Griffin, 51 Ill. 184, governs. Beck v. Briggs, 3 Den. 107; Ruckman v. Bryan, 3 Den. 340.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Gary, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. B. M. Shaffner, for appellant.",
      "Mr. E. H. Morris, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "B. M. Shaffner v. P. B. S. Pinchback.\nGaming\u2014Money Advanced.\nMoney advanced, either as a loan or on joint account, to be bet on a horse race, can not be recovered.\n[Opinion filed March 13, 1889.]\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Julius S. Grinnell, Judge, presiding.\nMr. B. M. Shaffner, for appellant.\nAppellee admits receiving $1,000 from appellant for wagering on horse races. This is gaming. Tatman v. Strader, 23 Ill. 493.\nAnd is clearly recoverable under the statutes. See 179 and 180, Chap. 38, R. S.\nUnder appellee\u2019s theory, the most favorable position he occupies is that of stakeholder. The law is well settled that money deposited with a stakeholder and by him not paid over, is recoverable by the depositor. Cotton v. Thurland, 5 T. R. 405 ; Hastelow v. Jackson, 8 B. & C. 221; Smith v. Bickmore, 4 Taunt. 474; Bate v. Cartright, 7 Price, 540; Hudson v. Terrell, 1 Cromp. & M. 797 ; Martin v. Hewson, 10 Exch. Rep. 737.\nMr. E. H. Morris, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0355-01",
  "first_page_order": 351,
  "last_page_order": 352
}
