{
  "id": 2421652,
  "name": "Moses Rohrheimer v. James K. Eagle et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rohrheimer v. Eagle",
  "decision_date": "1889-01-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "498",
  "last_page": "498",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "30 Ill. App. 498"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 83,
    "char_count": 916,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "sha256": "649b76036b24105243b94e306ffd60c7b4dd65b3dc2d823360c0fdc57c0f1428",
    "simhash": "1:0aa48b0f22894d30",
    "word_count": 155
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:02:08.632983+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Moses Rohrheimer v. James K. Eagle et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is an appeal from Kankakee. Upon inspecting the record we find that there is no certificate of the judge to the bill of exceptions. In the absence of this certificate we can not inspect the evidence and we must presume the proceedings of the Circuit Court were in all respects regular, and the judgment was correct, the presumption of law being in favor of the regularity of the proceedings of all courts of general jurisdiction unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. C. A. Lake, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Moses Rohrheimer v. James K. Eagle et al.\nPractice\u2014 Bill of Exceptions\u2014Presumption.\nIn the absence of the certificate of the judge of the trial court to the bill of exceptions, the presumption is in favor of the regularity of the proceedings.\n[Opinion filed January 10, 1889.]\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Kankakee County; the Hon. H. J. Pillsuuby, Judge, presiding.\nMr. C. A. Lake, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0498-01",
  "first_page_order": 494,
  "last_page_order": 494
}