{
  "id": 3305170,
  "name": "Elizabeth Johnson, Appellee, v. India Tea Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Johnson v. India Tea Co.",
  "decision_date": "1940-02-23",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 40,935",
  "first_page": "255",
  "last_page": "255",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "304 Ill. App. 255"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 53,
    "char_count": 401,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.51,
    "sha256": "f055a12bfcff542f6195374010e85bf493d96122fc2994d303eca6a44cbbc3da",
    "simhash": "1:9680ba4f066b272f",
    "word_count": 60
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:13.748655+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Elizabeth Johnson, Appellee, v. India Tea Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion by Presiding\nJustice John J. Sullivan.\n\u201cNot to be published in full.\u201d",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Justice John J. Sullivan."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. Harold Rutherford, for appellant;",
      "Richard E. Keogh, of counsel;",
      "Rosen, Francis & Cleveland, for appellee;",
      "James B. O \u2019Shaughnessy, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Elizabeth Johnson, Appellee, v. India Tea Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 40,935.\nHeard in second division, first district, at October term, 1939;\nopinion filed February 23, 1940.\nW. Harold Rutherford, for appellant;\nRichard E. Keogh, of counsel;\nRosen, Francis & Cleveland, for appellee;\nJames B. O \u2019Shaughnessy, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0255-01",
  "first_page_order": 279,
  "last_page_order": 279
}