{
  "id": 3375183,
  "name": "Henry Eimers, Appellee, v. Herman Gussewelle, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eimers v. Gussewelle",
  "decision_date": "1941-03-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "321",
  "last_page": "321",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "309 Ill. App. 321"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 68,
    "char_count": 528,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.535,
    "sha256": "0bcd25c50d3f3940cae367342a04b267c88a0475064aad2edf3aa10ea8d1a823",
    "simhash": "1:52d5c1c66f8b9ed6",
    "word_count": 88
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:28:11.862666+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry Eimers, Appellee, v. Herman Gussewelle, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dady\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is a $19.50 bull calf replevin case started in justice court, tried on appeal in the circuit court and appealed to this court.\nThere is not involved any question of public interest or any new or unusual proposition of law.\nWe find no reversible error.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dady"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hiles & Newell, of Edwardsville, for appellant.",
      "John M. Karns, and Harold J. Bandy, both of East St. Louis, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry Eimers, Appellee, v. Herman Gussewelle, Appellant.\nOpinion filed March 1, 1941.\nHiles & Newell, of Edwardsville, for appellant.\nJohn M. Karns, and Harold J. Bandy, both of East St. Louis, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0321-01",
  "first_page_order": 377,
  "last_page_order": 377
}