{
  "id": 4977222,
  "name": "William R. Griffith v. M. L. Welsh et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Griffith v. Welsh",
  "decision_date": "1890-02-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "396",
  "last_page": "397",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "32 Ill. App. 396"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "84 Ill. 45",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2650089
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/84/0045-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 Ill. 72",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2573696
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/11/0072-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "113 Ill. 654",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2865088
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/113/0654-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 90,
    "char_count": 884,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.546,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.224285640349418e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4312566099413518
    },
    "sha256": "543a53d9a5f6dbd4b282505ed7623102d7fffc9b3da56b9d2675c49e1c75972a",
    "simhash": "1:56af9ea632949d80",
    "word_count": 158
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:59:20.043421+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William R. Griffith v. M. L. Welsh et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe judgment in this case must be affirmed because the bill of exceptions fails to show that a motion for a new trial, or exception to the judgment was - made. The record of the judgment as certified by the clerk does so show, but this is not the proper mode. James v. Dexter, 113 Ill. 654; Dickett v. Durrell, 11 Ill. 72; Law v. Fletcher, 84 Ill. 45.\nThe judgment of the County Court will therefore be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. S. S. Whitehead, for appellant.",
      "Mr. Newton Tibbs, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William R. Griffith v. M. L. Welsh et al.\nPractice\u2014Bill of Exceptions.\nThis court will not interfere with the judgment of the trial court where the bill of exceptions fails to show a motion for a new trial made, or exception to the judgment entered.\n[Opinion filed February 14, 1890.]\nAppeal from the County Court of Clark County; the Hon. H. Gassaway, Judge, presiding.\nMr. S. S. Whitehead, for appellant.\nMr. Newton Tibbs, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0396-01",
  "first_page_order": 390,
  "last_page_order": 391
}