{
  "id": 4981235,
  "name": "Frank Banke, Sr. et al., Appellants, v. Cecil C. Erickson, Receiver, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Banke v. Erickson",
  "decision_date": "1943-06-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 42,149",
  "first_page": "142",
  "last_page": "143",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "320 Ill. App. 142"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "300 Ill. App. 192",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        3235936
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/300/0192-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "304 Ill. App. 491",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        3305445
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/304/0491-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 155,
    "char_count": 1527,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1546777437603505
    },
    "sha256": "0ee7b1c57afb9f0d5eca80ebe3ad24447aa49eb4a74c911195bb297afcc73333",
    "simhash": "1:62d10751fa47e694",
    "word_count": 247
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:10:35.834963+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank Banke, Sr. et al., Appellants, v. Cecil C. Erickson, Receiver, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Kiley\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis'is an appeal by defendants from a foreclosure decree.\nThe decree was based on findings of a special master and defendants\u2019 only objections to the master\u2019s report were to the findings, in plaintiff\u2019s favor, on the defense of fraud. No point is urged here based on those objections or that defense. All points (except one) made here are based upon matters to which defendants did not object. We cannot consider those points. Moulding-Brownell Corp. v. Delfosse Const. Co., 304 Ill. App. 491, and Kraus Bond & Mortgage Organisation v. Vicari, 300 Ill. App. 192. The excepted point is jurisdictional. Defendants contend the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter the decree. The trial court had power over the foreclosure action and defendants answered. Defendants\u2019 briefs and argument do not point out, and we shall not search the record for, the alleged jurisdictional defects.\nFor the reasons given the decree is affirmed, but since it does not appear to our satisfaction that the appeal was prosecuted for delay, we shall not allow plaintiff\u2019s damages under ch. 33, sec. 23, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1941 [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 107.060].\nDecree affirmed.\nBurke, P. J., and Hebel, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Kiley"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Andrew Pettinger, of Chicago, for appellants.",
      "William Jaffe, of Chicago, for appellee; Harry Jaffe, of Chicago, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Frank Banke, Sr. et al., Appellants, v. Cecil C. Erickson, Receiver, Appellee.\nGen. No. 42,149.\nOpinion filed June 30, 1943.\nRehearing denied August 9, 1943.\nAndrew Pettinger, of Chicago, for appellants.\nWilliam Jaffe, of Chicago, for appellee; Harry Jaffe, of Chicago, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0142-01",
  "first_page_order": 180,
  "last_page_order": 181
}