{
  "id": 4973850,
  "name": "Rome Soap Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. John T. La Forge and Sons, Inc., et al., Defendants; John T. La Forge and Sons, Inc., Petitioner, v. New York Central Railroad Company and Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Respondents",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rome Soap Manufacturing Co. v. John T. La Forge & Sons, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1944-03-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 42,742",
  "first_page": "281",
  "last_page": "282",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "322 Ill. App. 281"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 754,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.504,
    "sha256": "fecf26ddb709071052ae0fad67ec7e59efc2ef4cdcd438ff1e8dd9be2ed5d1d1",
    "simhash": "1:df299a35cd614e79",
    "word_count": 119
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:14:26.272017+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rome Soap Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. John T. La Forge and Sons, Inc., et al., Defendants. John T. La Forge and Sons, Inc., Petitioner, v. New York Central Railroad Company and Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Respondents."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion by\nJustice Scanlan.\nNot to be published in full.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Justice Scanlan."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Large, Reno & Zahm and Taylor, Miller, Busch & Boy den, for petitioner; Ralph S. Zahm and Charles R. Sprowl, of counsel; Packard, Barnes, Schumacher & Gilmore and Charles Edward Newton, for respondent; Sidney C. Murray, Frederick W. Flott and Victor L. Lewis, for certain respondent; C. W. Krohl and C. A. Conway; for certain other respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Rome Soap Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. John T. La Forge and Sons, Inc., et al., Defendants. John T. La Forge and Sons, Inc., Petitioner, v. New York Central Railroad Company and Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Respondents.\nGen. No. 42,742.\nHeard in the second division, first district, this court;\nopinion filed March 8, 1944.\nLarge, Reno & Zahm and Taylor, Miller, Busch & Boy den, for petitioner; Ralph S. Zahm and Charles R. Sprowl, of counsel; Packard, Barnes, Schumacher & Gilmore and Charles Edward Newton, for respondent; Sidney C. Murray, Frederick W. Flott and Victor L. Lewis, for certain respondent; C. W. Krohl and C. A. Conway; for certain other respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0281-01",
  "first_page_order": 301,
  "last_page_order": 302
}