{
  "id": 4990567,
  "name": "George A. Elton v. Ferdinand Brettschneider",
  "name_abbreviation": "Elton v. Brettschneider",
  "decision_date": "1889-07-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "355",
  "last_page": "356",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "33 Ill. App. 355"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "28 Ill. 325",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5202701
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/28/0325-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1531,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3451673913994262e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6320762330159017
    },
    "sha256": "a8fdd4db6009cba24971f3eaee73276090c1473d6569b59cfeb6b261c57ee476",
    "simhash": "1:365637284cd1806a",
    "word_count": 271
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:29:56.882977+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George A. Elton v. Ferdinand Brettschneider."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Gaby, J.\nThis is a bill filed by the appellant to he relieved from a part of a judgment by default against him in favor of the appellee, on the ground that he had paid money on account which was not credited to him, so that the judgment was $240.97 too much.\nAs excuse for not defending the suit, he alleges that he was summoned to the August term; went to the court rooms on the morning of the first Monday in August, found no courts in session, and was told by various officers of the court that there would be no court until September 17th ; that he believed them, and his attorney being out of town he paid no more attention to the suit. That he did not know until the t\u00e9rra was over, that judgment had been taken.\nEquity can not give relief on such grounds. The appellee is not chargeable with the consequences of the appellant\u2019s ignorance or negligence, and the decree dismissing the bill is affirmed. Albro v. Dayton, 28 Ill. 325.\nDecree affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Gaby, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hr. C. J. Beattie, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Burke & Hollett, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George A. Elton v. Ferdinand Brettschneider.\nJudgments\u2014Default\u2014Payment in Part\u2014Failure to Credit\u2014Bill for Relief.\nUpon a bill filed for relief from part of a judgment by default, it being alleged that certain payments had not been credited, this court holds that the reasons adduced for not defending were insufficient, and declines to interfere with a decree dismissing the same.\n[Opinion filed July 2, 1889.]\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry M. Shepabd, Judge, presiding.\nHr. C. J. Beattie, for appellant.\nMessrs. Burke & Hollett, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0355-01",
  "first_page_order": 353,
  "last_page_order": 354
}