{
  "id": 5070597,
  "name": "Isaiah Mitchell, III, Appellant, v. Tribune Company, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mitchell v. Tribune Co.",
  "decision_date": "1951-06-01",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 45,353",
  "first_page": "446",
  "last_page": "447",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "343 Ill. App. 446"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "281 Ill. App. 495",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        3277389
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/281/0495-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1492,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.2998387749345455e-08,
      "percentile": 0.33492454579398256
    },
    "sha256": "137773a7f2c306a84bc3eccb5757e7db04b1aeb95cda7eacdb02c623bd7394ae",
    "simhash": "1:11df179273dd2466",
    "word_count": 238
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:04:13.341027+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Isaiah Mitchell, III, Appellant, v. Tribune Company, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Feinberg\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nPlaintiff brought this action for libel against defendant based upon two articles published in its newspaper. The first article, it was alleged, referred to plaintiff as Isaiah \u201cChink\u201d Mitchell, \u201cNegro,\u201d and the second article again referred to plaintiff as \u201cChink,\u201d and the claimed libel in the complaint was the reference to plaintiff as \u201cNegro\u201d and \u201cChink.\u201d Upon motion the complaint was dismissed and judgment entered for defendant. A subsequent motion made by plaintiff to vacate the judgment was denied, and from this latter order the appeal is taken.\nThe complaint and the proffered amendment to the complaint, which the court denied leave to file, fail to state a cause of action in libel. The reference 1o plaintiff was not libelous per se (Wright v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 281 Ill. App. 495, and cases there cited), arid the complaint otherwise is insufficient to make the alleged articles libelous where no special damages are properly alleged. The court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the proffered amendment. The judgment is affirmed.\nAffirmed.\nFiemeyer, P. J. and Tuohy, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Feinberg"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Isaiah Mitchell, pro se.",
      "Kirkland, Fleming, Green, Martin & Ellis, of Chicago, for appellee; Howard Ellis, J. B. Martineau, and Georges Dapples, all of Chicago, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Isaiah Mitchell, III, Appellant, v. Tribune Company, Appellee.\nGen. No. 45,353.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1951.\nReleased for publication June 22, 1951.\nIsaiah Mitchell, pro se.\nKirkland, Fleming, Green, Martin & Ellis, of Chicago, for appellee; Howard Ellis, J. B. Martineau, and Georges Dapples, all of Chicago, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0446-01",
  "first_page_order": 468,
  "last_page_order": 469
}