{
  "id": 5091314,
  "name": "People of State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Earl Wilson and Marie Johnson, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Wilson",
  "decision_date": "1952-06-18",
  "docket_number": "Gen. Nos. 45,701, 45,702",
  "first_page": "399",
  "last_page": "400",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "347 Ill. App. 399"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "217 Ill. App. 617",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2988840
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/217/0617-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1315,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.509,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15527565506714872
    },
    "sha256": "8047d8192d84b97b248ecadd2d8956298f6b3eeeeda80d5e1a1e03cf204e3962",
    "simhash": "1:0d39013df28e43d9",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:43:05.250782+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "People of State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Earl Wilson and Marie Johnson, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Lews\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nPlaintiffs in Error, Earl Wilson and Marie Johnson, were each charged with possession of narcotics. A jury trial in the municipal court of Chicago resulted in a finding that each of plaintiffs in error was guilty in the manner and form as charged in the information. The abstract of records shows the verdict of the jury and the punishment fixed by it. It does not show the entry in the municipal court of any judgment. Where, as here, the abstract fails to show any judgment entered by the trial court, there is nothing to review. Sellers v. Puritan Product Co., 217 Ill. App. 617.\nFor the reasons given, the writ of error is dismissed.\nWrit of error dismissed.\nKilby, P. J. and Feinberg, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Lews"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Maurice Scott, Jr., of Chicago, for plaintiffs in error; Maurice Scott, Jr., of Chicago, of counsel.",
      "John S. Boyle, State\u2019s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago, for defendants in error; John T. Gallagher, Rudolph L. Janega, Arthur F. Manning, William J. McGah, Jr., and James A. Condon, Assistant State\u2019s Attorneys, all of Chicago, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "People of State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Earl Wilson and Marie Johnson, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. Nos. 45,701, 45,702.\nOpinion filed June 18, 1952.\nReleased for publication July 17, 1952.\nMaurice Scott, Jr., of Chicago, for plaintiffs in error; Maurice Scott, Jr., of Chicago, of counsel.\nJohn S. Boyle, State\u2019s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago, for defendants in error; John T. Gallagher, Rudolph L. Janega, Arthur F. Manning, William J. McGah, Jr., and James A. Condon, Assistant State\u2019s Attorneys, all of Chicago, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0399-01",
  "first_page_order": 421,
  "last_page_order": 422
}