{
  "id": 859932,
  "name": "The Hazelton Boiler Company v. The Hazelton Tripod Boiler Company et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hazelton Boiler Co. v. Hazelton Tripod Boiler Co.",
  "decision_date": "1890-11-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "310",
  "last_page": "310",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "37 Ill. App. 310"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "37 Ill. App. 133",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        860013
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/37/0133-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1134,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.458523723746264e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6565226389646656
    },
    "sha256": "57dfdcd5df9747ed75ccbaf0bd309372d6a5c1b2e33c533cfe1c911e562163b1",
    "simhash": "1:76678fa09e0a2e22",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:53:41.478670+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Hazelton Boiler Company v. The Hazelton Tripod Boiler Company et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Gary, J.\nThis is a bill by the appellant, a New York corporation, the principal object of which is to prevent the principal appellees, an Illinois corporation, from using the name \u201cHazelton\u201d even as part of the corporate name, \u201cThe Hazelton Tripod Boiler Company,\u201d in the business of making and selling boilers. The right so to use that name is a part of the franchise granted to the appellees by this State. If it is to be taken from them, it must be by some court having jurisdiction of a case where a franchise is involved, a jurisdiction which the Appellate Courts of this State do not possess. Bushnell v. Consolidated Ice Co., 37 Ill. App. 133.\nThe appeal must-be dismissed. Appeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Gary, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Ephraim Banning, Thomas A. Banning and George S. Payson, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Bond, Adams & Jones, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Hazelton Boiler Company v. The Hazelton Tripod Boiler Company et al.\nJurisdiction\u2014Appellate Court\u2014Franchise.\nThis court has no jurisdiction of controversies involving a franchise.\n[Opinion filed November 11, 1890.]\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry M. Shepard, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Ephraim Banning, Thomas A. Banning and George S. Payson, for appellant.\nMessrs. Bond, Adams & Jones, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0310-01",
  "first_page_order": 308,
  "last_page_order": 308
}
