{
  "id": 859888,
  "name": "Edward H. Foreman v. Peter Johnson",
  "name_abbreviation": "Foreman v. Johnson",
  "decision_date": "1890-12-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "452",
  "last_page": "453",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "37 Ill. App. 452"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "114 Ill. 206",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2869489
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/114/0206-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "113 Ill. 654",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2865088
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/113/0654-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "115 Ill. 566",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2876358
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/115/0566-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "42 Ill. 321",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5293726
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/42/0321-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "38 Ill. 197",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        428276
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/38/0197-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "30 Ill. App. 356",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2420676
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/30/0356-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "25 Ill. App. 248",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4934407
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/25/0248-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 Ill. App. 259",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5781267
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/24/0259-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1504,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.579,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.642890480079861e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8896900939012274
    },
    "sha256": "849d700e6e177fa82f44716896689d7dd58f5154257787bfb314bb5f6c4f7d2f",
    "simhash": "1:18280d3d1cb28db4",
    "word_count": 289
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:53:41.478670+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edward H. Foreman v. Peter Johnson."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Waterman, J.\nIt does not appear from the bill of exceptions that any motion for a new trial was made in this case, or that any exception was taken to any action of the court in overruling such motion, if any was made.\nA motion for a new trial is not a part of the record, nor are exceptions taken to the action of the court upon the same. Such motion and exceptions must be made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions or we can not take notice thereof.\nThe minute made by the clerk of the motion for a new trial and exception to the action of the court thereon are no part of the record. Obermark v. The People, 24 Ill. App. 259; C. & N. W. R. R. Co. v. Benham, 25 Ill. App. 248; Shedd v. Dalzell, 30 Ill. App. 356; Daniels v. Shields, 38 Ill. 197; Gill v. The People, 42 Ill. 321; Graham v. The People, 115 Ill. 566-569; James v. Dexter, 113 Ill. 654; Martin v. Foulke, 114 Ill. 206.\nThere is nothing in this record upon which we can set aside the action of the court, and its judgment is therefore affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Waterman, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. B. J. Wertheimer, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. H. C. Bennett and W. A. Phelps, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edward H. Foreman v. Peter Johnson.\nPractice\u2014New Trial\u2014Bill of Exceptions.\nA motion for a new trial and exceptions to the action of the court thereon, must be made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions, or this court can not take notice thereof.\n[Opinion filed December 11, 1890.]\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. S. P. McConnell, Judge, presiding.\nMr. B. J. Wertheimer, for appellant.\nMessrs. H. C. Bennett and W. A. Phelps, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0452-01",
  "first_page_order": 450,
  "last_page_order": 451
}