{
  "id": 5017584,
  "name": "I. Burnett v. H. Snapp",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burnett v. Snapp",
  "decision_date": "1891-06-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "237",
  "last_page": "237",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "39 Ill. App. 237"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "23 Ill. App. 483",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "114 Ill. 206",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2869489
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/114/0206-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1213,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1557160347743625e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5827938231147839
    },
    "sha256": "4b023edba165bd2e22d47792f9396f95d86b6a91c8338c2a61ce389425932980",
    "simhash": "1:92a0082e6d75b578",
    "word_count": 226
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:45:34.976789+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "I. Burnett v. H. Snapp."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "C. B. Smith, P. J.\nThis was a suit begun before a justice of the peace and brought to the Circuit Court by appeal. The suit was to recover for a month\u2019s rent for a certain house after appellant had abandoned it and moved away. Appellee had judgment below, and appellant now brings the record here on appeal. The bill of exceptions show no motion for a new trial nor any exception to the judgment. The' recital in the judgment by the clerk that a motion was made for a new trial amounts to nothing. It must be in the bill of exceptions and signed by the judge. There is, therefore, nothing for us to review. Martin v. Foulk, 114 Ill. 206; Wolfe v. Campbell, 23 Ill. App. 483.\nThe judgment will be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "C. B. Smith, P. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Haley & O\u2019Donnell, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Mr. H. M. Snapp, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "I. Burnett v. H. Snapp.\nPractice\u2014Bill of Exceptions\u2014Must Show Motion for New Trial.\nA recital in the judgment, by the clerk, that a motion was made for a new trial, is a nullity. The fact that such motion was made must appear in the bill of exceptions signed by the judge.\n[Opinion filed June 11, 1891.]\nIn error to the Circuit Court of Will County; the Hon. Dorr an oe Diuell, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Haley & O\u2019Donnell, for plaintiff in error.\nMr. H. M. Snapp, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0237-01",
  "first_page_order": 233,
  "last_page_order": 233
}