{
  "id": 5031057,
  "name": "Robert Maass et al. v. Friedrich Hess",
  "name_abbreviation": "Maass v. Hess",
  "decision_date": "1891-07-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "282",
  "last_page": "283",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "41 Ill. App. 282"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "126 Ill. 219",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5404536
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/126/0219-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 155,
    "char_count": 1737,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.5,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0417561518279476e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5509475648966407
    },
    "sha256": "2217a68d39842cfaff8f15a659908c30f014336116960786f4d4e3ea32bcf217",
    "simhash": "1:aa7749c42c52a1d8",
    "word_count": 301
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:42:40.256502+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Robert Maass et al. v. Friedrich Hess."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Gary, J.\nThe only question upon this record is whether \u201cThe Rational Corporation Reporter,\u201d a weekly publication. of twenty pages, including a colored cover of four pages, three of which are occupied with advertisements, and the front one by the title, and the intermediate ones with reading matter, mainly, but not exclusively, relating to law and finance of interest to corporations, is a newspaper, within the meaning of Sec. 1, Chap. 100, R. S., Hotices. Since the decision of Railton v. Lauder, 126 Ill. 219, it can not be questioned that its contents entitle it to that appellation.\nBeing published by a corporation, \"t is objected that the corporation can not, under that section, make a certificate of the fact of a publication in the paper The words of the section require a \u201ccertificate of the publisher by himself or his authorized agent;\u201d yet a woman, under clause 4, or a corporation, under clause 5, of Sec. 1, Chap. 131, R. S., may comply with Sec. 1, Chap. 100.\nThe order of the Circuit Court, refusing t > set aside a sheriff\u2019s sale, of which notice was published in the Reporter, is affirmed.\nOrder affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Gary, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. William M. Potts, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Mr. Herman Volimer, for defendant in error.",
      "Messrs. Moses & Pam, for the sheriff of Cook County."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robert Maass et al. v. Friedrich Hess.\nNewspapers\u2014Notices\u2014Sec. I, Chap. 100, B. S.\u2014Sheriff\u2019s Sale.\n1. This court holds that a weekly publication named, is a \u2018\u2018newspaper\u201d within the meaning of Sec. 1, Chap. 100, R. S.\n2. Where such paper is published by a corporation, it can, under Sec. 1, make a certificate of the fact of publication therein.\n[Opinion filed July 23, 1891.]\nIn error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. S. P. McConnell, Judge, presiding.\nMr. William M. Potts, for plaintiffs in error.\nMr. Herman Volimer, for defendant in error.\nMessrs. Moses & Pam, for the sheriff of Cook County."
  },
  "file_name": "0282-01",
  "first_page_order": 278,
  "last_page_order": 279
}