{
  "id": 5064143,
  "name": "North Chicago Street Railway Company v. E. A. Hudson",
  "name_abbreviation": "North Chicago Street Railway Co. v. Hudson",
  "decision_date": "1892-03-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "60",
  "last_page": "60",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "44 Ill. App. 60"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "129 Ill. 87",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2964944
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/129/0087-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "42 Ill. 169",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5295113
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/42/0169-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "41 Ill. App. 324",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5028552
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/41/0324-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "33 Ill. App. 488",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4986499
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/33/0488-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "30 Minn. 465",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Minn.",
      "case_ids": [
        8876627
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/minn/30/0465-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1547,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.445,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15511869610930984
    },
    "sha256": "c19d7b366761068e45f665553c3ca0752af76ad423564f423fa20131a5234174",
    "simhash": "1:f55cfa1648a9e053",
    "word_count": 265
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:00:30.730018+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "North Chicago Street Railway Company v. E. A. Hudson."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Gary, J.\nThis is an action by the appellee to recover the value of a horse lost by the effect of having his foot caught in the crossing of the track of appellant and the track of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway. We are constrained to reverse the judgment because of the admission, over the objection and exception of the appellant, of evidence of other accidents at the same place while the crossing was in the same condition. The cases conflict as to whether such evidence is admissible. Morse v. Minn. & St. L. Ry., 30 Minn. 465. But this court is committed to the doctrine that it is not. Kolb v. Chicago Stamping Co., 33 Ill. App. 488; Chicago Anderson Pressed Brick Company v. Reinninger, 41 Ill. App. 324.\nWhatever inference in favor of the admissibility of such evidence in general, might be drawn from City of Chicago v. Powers, 42 Ill. 169, in Hodges v. Bearse, 129 Ill. 87, is fairly rebutted.\nThe judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed mid remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Gary, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Edmund Eurthmann, for appellant.",
      "Mr. Robert Yan Sands, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "North Chicago Street Railway Company v. E. A. Hudson.\nStreet Railways\u2014Evidence.\nIn an action brought to recover the value of a horse, lost through having his foot caught in the crossing of defendant\u2019s street railway track and a railroad track, held, that evidence of other accidents at the same place, while the crossing was in the same condition, was incompetent.\n[Opinion filed March 4, 1892.]\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the lion. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.\nMr. Edmund Eurthmann, for appellant.\nMr. Robert Yan Sands, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0060-01",
  "first_page_order": 56,
  "last_page_order": 56
}