{
  "id": 5077872,
  "name": "W. B. Craig et al. v. David C. Southard et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Craig v. Southard",
  "decision_date": "1893-02-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "529",
  "last_page": "529",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "45 Ill. App. 529"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "125 Ill. 262",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2938895
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/125/0262-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "21 Ill. 497",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "21 Ill. App. 298",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2415424
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/21/0298-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 977,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.417,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4120110863606334
    },
    "sha256": "8bb516df3ab6a8f08bb497f42918ec2763b0dbac47d1e8c8c8107915f6aa482e",
    "simhash": "1:149054a34d4ee688",
    "word_count": 172
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:35:29.485129+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. B. Craig et al. v. David C. Southard et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis was a suit in equity for the purpose of contesting an instrument purporting to be the last will and testament of David Craig, deceased, whereby real estate was devised in fee, differently from the course of descent described by statute.\nA freehold was therefore involved, and this court has no jurisdiction of the writ of error. Bice v. Hall, 21 Ill. App. 298; Moyer v. Suygart, 21 Ill. 497, and same case 125 Ill. 262.\nThe writ of error will be dismissed, with leave to plaintiffs in error to withdraw the record if desired.\nWrit of error dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. S. 0. Stou&h and B. F. Shipley, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Messrs. E. L. Clover and W, E. David, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. B. Craig et al. v. David C. Southard et al.\nJurisdiction of Appellate Court\u2014Freehold.\nThis court has no jurisdiction of matters involving a freehold.\n[Opinion filed February 2, 1893.]\nIn error to the Circuit Court of Grundy County; the Hon. Charles Blanchard, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. S. 0. Stou&h and B. F. Shipley, for plaintiffs in error.\nMessrs. E. L. Clover and W, E. David, for defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0529-01",
  "first_page_order": 525,
  "last_page_order": 525
}