{
  "id": 5147113,
  "name": "John A. Wright v. Commissioners of Highways of the Town of Middlefork",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wright v. Commissioners of Highways",
  "decision_date": "1892-07-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "271",
  "last_page": "272",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "46 Ill. App. 271"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "130 Ill. 225",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        12123529
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/130/0225-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 Ill. 264",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5405175
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/126/0264-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1616,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.438,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3560111033500409
    },
    "sha256": "15fa66a448ea01ce4514b228a592185de9c08c96830bed223c34d314a3d8ebf7",
    "simhash": "1:ef77d22108a7a740",
    "word_count": 268
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:05.291643+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John A. Wright v. Commissioners of Highways of the Town of Middlefork."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Boggs.\nThis was a bill in chancery filed by the appellant to restrain the appellees from opening a public road upon his premises. The allegations are that the commissioners have made a final order laying out and establishing the road and are about to enter upon his land and open the same, which he alleges they ought to be restrained from doing because by reason of many alleged violations and omissions of legal requirements in the course of the proceedings to establish the highway the order establishing the highway is invalid and no public road was thereby created. A public road is a perpetual easement in land and is a freehold. The direct, question sought to be presented is whether the appellees, as commissioners of highways, have such an easement over the land of the appellant.\nA freehold being thus involved, this court is without jurisdiction to determine the contention. Chaplin v. Com\u2019s of Highways, 126 Ill. 264; Malaer v. Hudgens, 130 Ill. 225.\nThe appeal must be dismissed with leave to parties to withdraw the records, abstracts and briefs.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Boggs."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. J. B. Mann, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Lawrence & Lawrence, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John A. Wright v. Commissioners of Highways of the Town of Middlefork.\nJurisdiction of Appellate Court\u2014Question of Freehold\u2014Public Highway.\nWhere the direct question presented by a record is as to the existence of a legal highway in a certain placo, a question of freehold is involved and this court is without jurisdiction.\n[Opinion filed July 5, 1892.]\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Yermilion County; the Hon. F. Booicwalter, Judge, presiding.^\nMr. J. B. Mann, for appellant.\nMessrs. Lawrence & Lawrence, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0271-01",
  "first_page_order": 269,
  "last_page_order": 270
}