{
  "id": 5147209,
  "name": "Isaac Keim v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Keim v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1892-12-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "445",
  "last_page": "446",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "46 Ill. App. 445"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "102 U. S. 82",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "19 Ill. App. 409",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4902355
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/19/0409-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "101 Ill. 475",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2819180
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/101/0475-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1809,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.497,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.4702453117064667e-07,
      "percentile": 0.65908166846793
    },
    "sha256": "0e910039aa87de93c0722c048d5d0c79c94c1275c2d53addb77b2aa760203204",
    "simhash": "1:7053f9d8ddb1a118",
    "word_count": 293
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:05.291643+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Isaac Keim v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Watermar.\nAppellant as the secretary of Siegel, Cooper & Company, a corporation, was arrested and fined $50 for violating Sec. 2118 of Art. 23 of the ordinances of the city of Chicago.\nFrom the judgment so imposed he prosecutes this appeal. \"We have not been informed of any and we find no statute empowering the city of Chicago to license or regulate or prohibit the keeping of intelligence offices. The provisions of the charter permitting the city to regulate certain occupations are in effect a prohibition against its interference with business concerning which the charter makes no mention. City of Cairo v. Bross, 101 Ill. 475; Holder v. City of Galena, 19 Ill. App. 409; Thomas v. West Jersey R. R. Co., 102 U. S. 82.\nThe city not having been empowered to regulate intelligence offices, the keeping of offices for the obtaining of places or employment for female domestic servants or other laborers, a penalty can not be imposed for a violation of the provisions of its ordinance in that regard.\nThe judgment of the court below is therefore reversed.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Watermar."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. A. Binswanger, for appellant.",
      "Mr. John S. Miller, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Isaac Keim v. The City of Chicago.\nCriminal Law\u2014Municipal Corporations\u2014Ordinances\u2014Intelligence Offices.\n1. The provisions of a municipal charter permitting the regulation of certain occupations, are in effect a prohibition against interference by the city with business concerning which the charter makes no mention.\n3. The city of Chicago not having been empowered to license, prohibit or regulate intelligence offices, the penalty prescribed for the violation of its ordinance relating to the subject, can not be imposed.\n[Opinion filed December 8, 1892.]\nAppeal from the Criminal Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Breetaeo, Judge, presiding.\nMr. A. Binswanger, for appellant.\nMr. John S. Miller, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0445-01",
  "first_page_order": 443,
  "last_page_order": 444
}