{
  "id": 5144703,
  "name": "John Kelly, Conservator, etc., v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kelly v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1892-12-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "460",
  "last_page": "460",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "46 Ill. App. 460"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "46 Ill. App. 306",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5145313
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/46/0306-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1473,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.477,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.605084407107731e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4501546229143089
    },
    "sha256": "e945593c018c0ff72fda02af1e89790362778eac4dca6196b96a9f048db2b59a",
    "simhash": "1:23c426668bdeb6d0",
    "word_count": 246
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:05.291643+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John Kelly, Conservator, etc., v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary.\nThe appellant is the conservator of Sarah Boggs, and filed a petition under a former decree to which the parties above named were parties, to compel the insurance company to execute a quit-claim to some real estate which had been sold under the decree, and bid in by the company, and for which the company, when the petition was filed, held a certificate of sale.\nThe ground of equity claimed in the petition is immaterial for present purposes. The only relief asked was that quit-claim; no other could be given on that petition; and that quit-claim the appellant obtained, by redeeming from the sale, before the certificate of evidence on which the case is presented to us, was made.\nTo determine now whether the appellant was entitled to the quit-claim without redeeming would be to act as a moot court. Loven v. People, 46 Ill. App. 306.\nThe appeal is dismissed.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. William H. Sisson, for appellant.",
      "Mr. James E. Munroe, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John Kelly, Conservator, etc., v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.\nBeal Property\u2014Sale\u2014Quit-claim.\nIn the case presented, this court holds that petitioner, having redeemed from the sale of certain real estate before \u2019 the certificate of evidence herein was made, that the decree of the lower court denying the prayer for a quit-claim deed from defendants was correct.\n[Opinion filed December 8, 1892.]\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.\nMr. William H. Sisson, for appellant.\nMr. James E. Munroe, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0460-01",
  "first_page_order": 458,
  "last_page_order": 458
}