{
  "id": 2438265,
  "name": "Louis Saltenberger et al. v. Conrad Lang",
  "name_abbreviation": "Saltenberger v. Lang",
  "decision_date": "1893-03-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "286",
  "last_page": "286",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "47 Ill. App. 286"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "121 Ill. 560",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5387282
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/121/0560-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "26 Ill. App. 466",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4945612
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/26/0466-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "22 Ill. App. 165",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4917454
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/22/0165-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1438,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.473,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08088598987817436
    },
    "sha256": "687178ae61aadbe0c7f1dc52f3f56d17dd752785b2a32bcac765a91d8d23442b",
    "simhash": "1:fea61ce7dcc92e34",
    "word_count": 236
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:46.022143+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Louis Saltenberger et al. v. Conrad Lang."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Phillips.\nAppellee brought suit before a justice of the peace against appellant to recover damages for injury to appellee\u2019s corn, caused by appellant\u2019s stock. Before a jury, a verdict and judgment was rendered for $5. The defendant prosecuted an appeal to the Circuit Court, where a trial was had by the court, a jury being waived, anda judgment for plaintiff for $5 was entered. \u00a1Nopropositions of law were submitted on either side, and no question of law raised in argument, and questions of fact alone are involved. The judge of the Circuit Court saw and heard the witnesses, and while there is conflict in the testimony he could better determine what motive actuated the witnesses, and their interest, than can be done from the record. Geelan v. Reid, 22 Ill. App. 165; The Consolidated Ice Machine Company v. Keefer, 26 Ill. App. 466; Aholtz v. The People, 121 Ill. 560.\nThe judgment is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Phillips."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Snyder & Snyder, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Turner & Holder, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Louis Saltenberger et al. v. Conrad Lang.\nTrespass hy Stoeh\u2014Growing Crops.\nIn the case presented, this court declines to interfere'with the judgment for the plaintiff, the questions involved being entirely of fact, the action having been brought to recover for damages done growing crops by- cattle.\n[Opinion filed March 3, 1893.]\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. B. R. Burroughs, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Snyder & Snyder, for appellant.\nMessrs. Turner & Holder, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0286-01",
  "first_page_order": 282,
  "last_page_order": 282
}