{
  "id": 2439336,
  "name": "Kate Howard v. George Howard",
  "name_abbreviation": "Howard v. Howard",
  "decision_date": "1893-06-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "453",
  "last_page": "454",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "47 Ill. App. 453"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1157,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.447,
    "sha256": "d28f513e2a47074ceac296f04196fb79424659aa8bbdcc8a3a65742aa9c9df5f",
    "simhash": "1:d026f271dfa5a430",
    "word_count": 191
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:46.022143+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Kate Howard v. George Howard."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Green.\nKate Howard filed a bill for separate maintenance against George Howard, who thereupon filed a cross-bill for divorce. The court below dismissed both bills. The court evidently found that appellee was a drunken, worthless man, who at times was cruel, and that appellant gave him cause, by her improper conduct, to gravely complain.\nThe court had the parties before it and could better judge than we, of the credibility of the evidence. In addition to this, appellee has nothing in the way of property to contribute to her support and the evidence does not indicate that he ever will have. The decree is affirmed.\nDecree affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Green."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. G. & G. A. Koerner and Fred B. Merrills, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Dill & Schaefer, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Kate Howard v. George Howard.\nSeparate Maintenance\u2014Divorce.\nIn view of the evidence in the case presented, wherein a wife filed a bill for separate maintenance, and her husband filed a cross-bill for divorce, this court declines to interfere with a decree dismissing both bills.\n[Opinion filed June 26, 1893.]\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. A. S. Wilderman, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. G. & G. A. Koerner and Fred B. Merrills, for appellant.\nMessrs. Dill & Schaefer, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0453-01",
  "first_page_order": 449,
  "last_page_order": 450
}