{
  "id": 5122245,
  "name": "Johnson v. Coit & Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Johnson v. Coit & Co.",
  "decision_date": "1893-05-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "245",
  "last_page": "245",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "50 Ill. App. 245"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1441,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.478,
    "sha256": "2ede4f6fb57637bb505b95c8b59f2fa9f9caea8c1a0b4384687ec08786e32828",
    "simhash": "1:20e16eeba100d352",
    "word_count": 240
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:57:42.711650+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Johnson v. Coit & Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion of the Court,\nShepard, J.\nThis was a suit at law for a balance claimed for goods sold and delivered by the appellee to the appellant.\nBo question of law is raised by the record. There were no instructions, and the single exception taken to the evidence, so far as the abstract discloses, was upon an immaterial question. Under such circumstances it is not the province of a reviewing court to set aside a judgment based upon a verdict rendered upon conflicting evidence. If there were merits in the case they are not pointed out.\nFor comments upon insufficient abstracts we refer to Tolman v. Dreyer, supra, page 143, and cases there cited.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Shepard, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bicholson, Matson & Pease, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Weigley, Bhlklby & Gray, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Johnson v. Coit & Company.\n\u25a01. Practice\u2014Appellate Cour\u00ed\u2014Defective Record.\u2014It is not the province of the Appellate Court to set aside a judgment based upon a verdict rendered upon conflicting evidence, where no question is raised by the record, no instructions, and the single exception taken to the evidence s upon an immaterial question.\nMemorandum. \u2014 Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard W. Clifford, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1893, and affirmed.\nOpinion filed May 11, 1893.\nThe statement of facts is contained in the opinion of the court.\nBicholson, Matson & Pease, attorneys for appellant.\nWeigley, Bhlklby & Gray, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0245-01",
  "first_page_order": 241,
  "last_page_order": 241
}