{
  "id": 5123455,
  "name": "Levy v. Berkowsky et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Levy v. Berkowsky",
  "decision_date": "1893-04-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "537",
  "last_page": "537",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "50 Ill. App. 537"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1671,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.512,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7518525211315409
    },
    "sha256": "8bf1ae492033a73e372597da5c7c414af19b489c58350b97addf64a210f31801",
    "simhash": "1:38635fb2541f5c39",
    "word_count": 284
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:57:42.711650+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Levy v. Berkowsky et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion of the Court,\nShepard, J.\nThe briefs and arguments of both parties filed in this court have proceeded upon the assumption that this appeal was from a decree allowing solicitors\u2019 fees and the value of the use and possession of the premises, as damages upon the dissolution of an injunction.\nDeference to the record discloses to us that the pretended decree, concerning which eighteen printed pages of argument on one side, and thirty-five printed pages of argument on the other side, have been filed with and read and considered by us, is only a decree for the costs to be taxed, of a reference to the master, and about which costs no complaint is made.\nThe part of that decree which confirms the master\u2019s report is merely interlocutory, and constitutes ho decree for the payment of any sum referred to in such report.\nWe can not review the master\u2019s report, but only a decree which the court below may enter upon it. Do fault with the decree as it is, being pointed out or alluded to, it will be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Shepard, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "David J. Wile, solicitor for appellant.",
      "Winston & Meagher, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Levy v. Berkowsky et al.\n1. Masters in Chancery\u2014Confirmatory Decree.\u2014That part of a decree which confirms a master\u2019s report is merely interlocutory and constitutes i.o decree for the payment of any sum referred to in such report.\nMemorandum.\u2014Chancery proceedings. In the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Lorin C. Collins, Judge, presiding. Bill for specific performance; answer and replication; trial and decree for defendant; appeal by complainant. Heard in this court at the March term, 1898, and affirmed.\nOpinion filed April 28, 1893.\nThe opinion states the case.\nDavid J. Wile, solicitor for appellant.\nWinston & Meagher, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0537-01",
  "first_page_order": 533,
  "last_page_order": 533
}