{
  "id": 5111910,
  "name": "Jansen et al. v. Siddal",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jansen v. Siddal",
  "decision_date": "1893-02-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "74",
  "last_page": "75",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 74"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "41 Ill. App. 279",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5031871
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/41/0279-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 1198,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.41225241317157874
    },
    "sha256": "fa763ef49867800bf8aa4e51f1731190fe5cceda9acbb52eb670ab1c0534b62a",
    "simhash": "1:d70356e5b8170c1c",
    "word_count": 203
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:36:15.137575+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jansen et al. v. Siddal."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nBy mutual request of the parties appearing of record here the remanding order indicated by the report of this case in 41 Ill. App. 279, was stricken out and the case taken by appeal to the Supreme Court. That court declines to examine the merits on such appeal, and has remanded the case here with directions to either remand the cause for another trial or incorporate in our final judgment a finding of facts.\n\u2022 In obedience to those directions the cause is remanded, the judgment being reversed upon the opinion already filed and reported.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mason Bros., attorneys for appellants.",
      "T. W. Beoicer, attorney for appellee,"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jansen et al. v. Siddal.\n1. Practice m Appellate Cottbus\u2014Appeal to Supreme Court\u2014Striking out Remanding Order.\u2014Where, by mutual request of the parties appearing of record, the remanding order of a case reversed was stricken out and the case taken by appeal to the Supreme Court, that court declines to examine the merits on such appeal.\nMemorandum.\u2014Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County. Heard in this court at the March term, 1893.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed February 14, 1893.\nThe opinion states the case.\nMason Bros., attorneys for appellants.\nT. W. Beoicer, attorney for appellee,"
  },
  "file_name": "0074-01",
  "first_page_order": 70,
  "last_page_order": 71
}