{
  "id": 5115533,
  "name": "John D. Adair v. Ida B. Adair",
  "name_abbreviation": "Adair v. Adair",
  "decision_date": "1894-02-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "301",
  "last_page": "302",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 301"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "29 Ill. 488",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2454528
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/29/0488-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "46 Ill. App. 562",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5148916
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/46/0562-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1506,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.491,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2643661385593175e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6131818882104709
    },
    "sha256": "53651e340b6436bea09eccab4fd5a164ab9511069bb504bb24b4be2ae33790eb",
    "simhash": "1:c8d8d69a831e9a9a",
    "word_count": 248
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:36:15.137575+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John D. Adair v. Ida B. Adair."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis is an appeal from an order of court directing the payment of alimony.\nThe clerk\u2019s certificate is that the foregoing is a \u201c true, perfect and complete transcript of the record according to praecipe.\u201d\nThe praecipe calls for \u201c original bill and answer; cross-bill and answer; appearance of W. J. Hynes, filed July 18, 1890; order entered July 3,1891; appearance of Duncan & Gilbert, filed March 15, 1893; order entered July 14, 1893; stipulation filed August 3, 1893; order entered August 3, 1893; appeal bond.\nWhether what is thus called for constitutes a complete record we do not know.\nIn the absence of a complete record, the presumption is that the omitted portion contains that which justified the action of the court. Alling v. Wengell, 46 Ill. App. 562.\nThe appeal will be dismissed. Van Meters v. Lobis, 29 Ill. 488.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Luther Laflin Mills and Hofheimer, Zeisleb & Maok, solicitors for appellant.",
      "Dunoan & Gilbert, attorneys for appellee; Charles W. Griggs, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John D. Adair v. Ida B. Adair.\n1. Record\u2014Absence of\u2014Presumptions,\u2014In the absence of a complete record, the presumption is that the omitted portion contains that which justified the action of the court.\nMemorandum.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuuey, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1893, and appeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed February 13, 1894.\nThe statement of facts is contained in the opinion of the court.\nLuther Laflin Mills and Hofheimer, Zeisleb & Maok, solicitors for appellant.\nDunoan & Gilbert, attorneys for appellee; Charles W. Griggs, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0301-01",
  "first_page_order": 297,
  "last_page_order": 298
}