{
  "id": 5115608,
  "name": "Feltenstein v. Stein",
  "name_abbreviation": "Feltenstein v. Stein",
  "decision_date": "1894-02-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "426",
  "last_page": "427",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 426"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 162,
    "char_count": 1883,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.473,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1386220523324002e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5779203729638291
    },
    "sha256": "db4c2c83aaa277113514ec10909bccdd7de262bc524e42a478d5749086a98748",
    "simhash": "1:33fe9e957e235448",
    "word_count": 327
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:36:15.137575+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Feltenstein v. Stein."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gaby\ndelivered the opinion oe the Court.\nWhen, if ever, a record in this cause gets here in such a shape that the merits of this controversy can be considered, the question will probably be, whether a signature of a judge to a line on the back of proper papers for a judgment by confession, which line is, \u201c enter judgment herein for \u201d (here amount is stated), such signature being made in the bedroom of the judge, away from the court house, with no clerk, sheriff, record, or appendage of a court present, other than the judge himself, out of humor with the lawyer who has waked him from a refreshing sleep, and the time being between midnight and two o\u2019clock of a Monday morning, such papers-being forthwith filed by a deputy of the clerk of the court, in the office of the clerk, and an execution made out and delivered to the deputy of the sheriff immediately, with nothing written up as a judgment on any record\u2014all put together\u2014give to the plaintiff in that execution any standing to question the title of the assignee of the defendant for the benefit of creditors, to the goods and chattels assigned.\nThis record is in such a fragmentary state that the appellee says the appeal should be dismissed, and the appellant assents to that being done, if we regard the record as insufficient. We do so regard it, and the appeal is dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gaby"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Moses, Pam & Kennedy, attorneys for appellant.",
      "G. W. Hobthrup, Je., and S. O. Levinson, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Feltenstein v. Stein.\n1. Record\u2014Insufficiency.\u2014An insufficient record is a sufficient ground for dismissing an appeal.\nMemorandum.\u2014Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Scales, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1893, and appeal dismissed for insufficiency of the record.\nOpinion filed February 13, 1894.\nThe statement of facts is contained in the opinion of the court.\nMoses, Pam & Kennedy, attorneys for appellant.\nG. W. Hobthrup, Je., and S. O. Levinson, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0426-01",
  "first_page_order": 422,
  "last_page_order": 423
}