{
  "id": 5114616,
  "name": "Doremus v. Clarke",
  "name_abbreviation": "Doremus v. Clarke",
  "decision_date": "1894-02-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "435",
  "last_page": "435",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 435"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1237,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.508,
    "sha256": "dc7e6745d0296e61340137ea53041864558ca93a0aa21c76f478badabe7940d9",
    "simhash": "1:80d623e6768a94ac",
    "word_count": 208
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:36:15.137575+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Doremus v. Clarke."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Shepard\ndelivered the opinion oe the Court.\nThe judgment appealed from was recovered upon evidence so strongly preponderating against the appellee, who was plaintiff below, that we are unable to discover any reasonable justification for it. The appellee apparently has no faith in its justice, for she does not appear in this court in its defense.\nThe dispute was a mere matter of accounting, and from the record as presented to us, which we have, although unaided by appellee, diligently examined, we can not see how the judgment can be upheld. It looks very much as if the judgment ought to have been considerably in favor of the appellant.\nWe will therefore reverse and remand the cause.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Shepard"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Francis A. Riddle and Frank B. Dyche, attorneys for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Doremus v. Clarke.\n1. Verdict\u2014Against the Weight of the Testimony.\u2014A verdict which is manifestly against the weight of the testimony should be set aside; a judgment based upon it will be reversed.\nMemorandum.\u2014Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brent ano, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1893.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed February 13, 1894.\nThe statement of facts is contained in the opinion of the court.\nFrancis A. Riddle and Frank B. Dyche, attorneys for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0435-01",
  "first_page_order": 431,
  "last_page_order": 431
}