{
  "id": 5114241,
  "name": "Harry L. Lee v. Emma B. Lee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lee v. Lee",
  "decision_date": "1893-11-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "565",
  "last_page": "566",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 565"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1342,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.496,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.236482251779787e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4318452542986097
    },
    "sha256": "59c34ffe139c5e0a0cf207fdcfe9596569d34ca0e8991d341e8d1ac1b6a3b69b",
    "simhash": "1:c6e747f4da8cb6ed",
    "word_count": 239
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:36:15.137575+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harry L. Lee v. Emma B. Lee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hr. Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion oe the Court.\nAppellee having filed her bill for divorce, afterward went with her husband, appellant, to a hotel in Chicago, and there, occupying the same room, lived with him for some months. This she does not deny; she merely declares that they did not occupy the same bed or \u201c cohabit.\u201d We do not care to go into a consideration of the truth of her statement in this regard.\nApparently she was then living with him as his wife; by her own confession her conduct was such as to be utterly inconsistent with the maintenance of her suit, and such that she is not permitted, for the matters in her bill alleged, to ask a decree of divorce.\nThe decree of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the bill.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hr. Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. J. Ward, attorney for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Harry L. Lee v. Emma B. Lee.\n1. Divorce\u2014Condonation.\u2014A wife having filed her bill for divorce, afterward went with her husband to a hotel, and occupying the same room, lived with him for some months. It was held she could not maintain the suit.\nMemorandum.\u2014Divorce proceedings. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County. Heard in this court at the October term, 1893, and reversed, with directions to dismiss the bill.\nOpinion filed November 27, 1893.\nThe statement of facts is contained in the opinion of the court.\nC. J. Ward, attorney for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0565-01",
  "first_page_order": 561,
  "last_page_order": 562
}