{
  "id": 5106702,
  "name": "Tycent Heindselman v. The People of the State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Heindselman v. People",
  "decision_date": "1894-03-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "542",
  "last_page": "543",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "52 Ill. App. 542"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 130,
    "char_count": 1682,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.515,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6013981896241827
    },
    "sha256": "987ad5d343d321de9497e273173d2fd6d744307f17057feda0ee91a7a5ecb0f2",
    "simhash": "1:0c436735c8ac9a90",
    "word_count": 290
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:04:33.379321+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Tycent Heindselman v. The People of the State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Sample\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe appellant was found to be the father of the bastard child of Estella Elston, and appealed the case to this court. Humorous errors are assigned. The third, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth instructions given for the appellee, were erroneous. The eighth was: \u201c The court instructs the j ury that the mother of the child is most likely to know who its father is, and by whom it was begotten, and it is for the jury to determine from all the evidence in the case, and all the circumstances, whether they believe the prosecuting witness has told the truth in this case or not.\u201d\nComment is unnecessary on this instruction. The ninth instruction is as fatally defective.\nThe appellee filed no briefs in this case, and therefore, under rule 27 of this court, we are authorized to reverse. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Sample"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "R. B. Witcher and McCauley & Rowland, attorneys for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Tycent Heindselman v. The People of the State of Illinois.\n1. Bastardy\u2014Erroneous Instructions.\u2014In a bastardy proceeding, it is error to instruct the jury that \u2018 \u2018 the mother of the child is most likely to know who its father is, and by whom it was begotten, and it is for the jury to determine from all the evidence in the case, and all the circumstances, whether they believe the prosecuting witness has told the truth in this case or not.\u201d\nMemorandum.\u2014Bastardy proceedings. Appeal from the County Court of Richland County; the Hon. T. A. Fritchey, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the August term, A. D. 1893.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed March 23, 1894.\nThe opinion states the case.\nR. B. Witcher and McCauley & Rowland, attorneys for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0542-01",
  "first_page_order": 538,
  "last_page_order": 539
}
