{
  "id": 5098851,
  "name": "William Davidson v. J. H. Colburn",
  "name_abbreviation": "Davidson v. Colburn",
  "decision_date": "1894-04-30",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "636",
  "last_page": "636",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "54 Ill. App. 636"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 94,
    "char_count": 1089,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.497,
    "sha256": "f42d236a156f4f57dc67b2ea17aa59bc7a57c30b10097c036df50b85f98da22c",
    "simhash": "1:681d06f11c15a318",
    "word_count": 178
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:51.601388+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Davidson v. J. H. Colburn."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe question in this case is entirely one of fact. The writer of this opinion is inclined to believe that the preponderance of the evidence is in favor of appellee. (The other members of the court think otherwise.). This court does not reverse judgments merely because it does not agree with the court below as to where the preponderance of the evidence lies.\nAfter a careful examination of the record, we see no sufficient reason for interfering with the judgment rendered in this canse, and it is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Eldredge & Finch, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Munn & Mapledoram, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Davidson v. J. H. Colburn.\n1. Appellate Court Practice.\u2014Preponderance of Evidence.\u2014The Appellate Court does not reverse judgments merely because it does not agree with the court below as to where the preponderance of the evidence lies.\nMemorandum.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G-. Windes, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1894,\nand affirmed.\nOpinion filed April 30, 1894.\nEldredge & Finch, attorneys for appellant.\nMunn & Mapledoram, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0636-01",
  "first_page_order": 634,
  "last_page_order": 634
}